The short of it: I am trying to make the test of 5ee6394 pass.
The long if it is discussed at Issue #1473.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1656#issuecommen
The pull request should only have the one relevant patch. Please rebase the
patch to the current master branch.
The patch is also missing a justification for the change. This should be part
of the commit message. But even ignoring the commit message I don't quite see
what you are trying to achi
Also use popt for the command line handling. As we are using librpm
anyway there is no reason to keep the dependencies low (as with
rpm2cpio).
Resolves: #1530
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1657
-- Commit Summ
This is obviously work in progress. Please let me know whether I can go
forward like that.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1656
-- Commit Summary --
* Build action
* ./autogen.sh
* install automake
*
Le lun. 26 avr. 2021 à 11:34, Panu Matilainen a
écrit :
>
> The beginning of this year has gone nothing like planned, and
> consequently we had to postpone and even revert some things originally
> planned for 4.17. But what the hey, there's plenty of good stuff here as
> it is, and there will alw
Closed #1652.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1652#event-4643298491___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm
Merged #1655 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1655#event-4643300633___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Ehm, there are 46 commits here, only one of which is somehow related to
LUA_CFLAGS. I don't know what the rest is supposed to be, certainly nothing to
do with upstream rpm. Please pay attention to what you submit as a PR. Also
while the rationale here in the PR totally fine, it belongs to the co
Merged #1654 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1654#event-4643270300___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit.
7b595a5775f35e8631d1447f964b619f66a1a8bb Fix memory leak regression from Lua
sources/patches
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1655/files/73254a50feff129ac0e984
Since commit 376fef14a61a9748ce004888fe19445719a5d2d5 librpmbuild is
calling Lua directly rather than through the rpmio wrapper layer, so
librpmbuild needs LUA_CFLAGS and LUA_LIBS for building. While librpm
does not currently call Lua directly, make native Lua available there
as well as it's only a
Merged #1629 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1629#event-4643076709___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Merged #1649 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1649#event-4643074188___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Closed #1648 via #1649.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1648#event-4643074197___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Ack, thanks for the patch!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1649#issuecomment-826601063___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@mlschroe - FYI
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1654#issuecomment-826599410___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@l
Merged #1653 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1653#event-4643053994___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Thanks for the typo-fix :)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1653#issuecomment-826598642___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Withdrawing this for now, see #1654
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1647#issuecomment-826598151___
Rpm-maint ma
Closed #1647.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1647#event-4643050923___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm
The implicit database creation even on read-only access is rooted so
deep in so many places that this needs more thought and saner APIs.
While creating databases on read-only access remains a crazy thing to
do, we need to have a proper solution to point people to when changing
the behavior, and rig
The beginning of this year has gone nothing like planned, and
consequently we had to postpone and even revert some things originally
planned for 4.17. But what the hey, there's plenty of good stuff here as
it is, and there will always be another release.
Highlights include:
- More robust in
22 matches
Mail list logo
