@DemiMarie pushed 10 commits.
6af8f3905501cac42f451f7eaa436d2cfd3d69ce Remove dead code
0d51987d7af0f33670ec83cc324ed64fdda7377c A signature is not a key
12962b27bbf24a1af26e5707e37043df947db215 Reject unimplemented critical PGP
packets
a95800fc459cfb8a2f9a79d5e86a2ca92ed6ddb6 Reset the saved
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -633,7 +633,17 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
rConflicts = handleColorConflict(ts, fs, fi, i,
otherFs, otherFi, otherFileNum);
- if (rConflicts && reportConflicts) {
+
@dmnks commented on this pull request.
> @@ -633,7 +633,17 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
rConflicts = handleColorConflict(ts, fs, fi, i,
otherFs, otherFi, otherFileNum);
- if (rConflicts && reportConflicts) {
+
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -633,7 +633,17 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
rConflicts = handleColorConflict(ts, fs, fi, i,
otherFs, otherFi, otherFileNum);
- if (rConflicts && reportConflicts) {
+
@pmatilai approved this pull request.
Rebase and ship it... the longer this lingers, the more conflicts and other
issues gather up.
I consider myself fairly old-school, but I can tell you I wont be missing those
roff-formatted man-pages a single bit.
--
You are receiving this because you ar
On a related note, having the manual actually rendered someplace nicely
highlights how rough, raw and miserably inadequate the content is :sweat_smile:
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -633,7 +633,17 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
rConflicts = handleColorConflict(ts, fs, fi, i,
otherFs, otherFi, otherFileNum);
- if (rConflicts && reportConflicts) {
+
with/without support in rpmspec was never specifically mentioned anywhere at
all because it happened as a part of a more generic change (see commit
1896e58ffdf2278c47fea5f6e7d29bbf81eac1ad). The first released version with
those aliases is actually 4.15.1. Basically just something that fell thro
We're bottlenecked on all manner of things, and submitting more PR's is not
always the best way to help.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1635#issuecomment
Merged #1679 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1679#event-4760538147___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -633,7 +633,17 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
rConflicts = handleColorConflict(ts, fs, fi, i,
otherFs, otherFi, otherFileNum);
- if (rConflicts && reportConflicts) {
+
@dmnks commented on this pull request.
> @@ -633,7 +633,17 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
rConflicts = handleColorConflict(ts, fs, fi, i,
otherFs, otherFi, otherFileNum);
- if (rConflicts && reportConflicts) {
+
@dmnks commented on this pull request.
> @@ -633,7 +633,17 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
rConflicts = handleColorConflict(ts, fs, fi, i,
otherFs, otherFi, otherFileNum);
- if (rConflicts && reportConflicts) {
+
@dmnks commented on this pull request.
> @@ -633,7 +633,17 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
rConflicts = handleColorConflict(ts, fs, fi, i,
otherFs, otherFi, otherFileNum);
- if (rConflicts && reportConflicts) {
+
@Conan-Kudo @dmach would you mind reviewing this PR?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1612#issuecomment-843238273_
15 matches
Mail list logo
