Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Translation update fiddling (PR #2464)

2023-04-03 Thread Panu Matilainen
Merged #2464 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2464#event-8920690164 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint maili

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Translation update fiddling (PR #2464)

2023-04-03 Thread Panu Matilainen
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2464 -- Commit Summary -- * Fix translation directory not getting added on out-of-tree builds * Update translation submodule for new translations and targets -- File Change

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Resolve --what arguments to package provides (PR #2451)

2023-04-03 Thread Neal Gompa
Thank you so much for finally doing this! 🥳 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2451#issuecomment-1494685753 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: __

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] x86-64-v3, x86-64-v3 detection must take XCR0 into account (Issue #2463)

2023-04-03 Thread Fabian Vogt
That indicates it uses it even for XMM, i.e. SSE might also not be available? There's even more fun: If OSXSAVE isn't set, then xgetbv raises #UD. However, this part can be implemented in a slightly nicer way by using compiler runtime support, which hopefully meanwhile does it correctly...: ```

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] x86-64-v3, x86-64-v3 detection must take XCR0 into account (Issue #2463)

2023-04-03 Thread Florian Weimer
OSXSAVE only indicates that it's safe to use XGETBV, I think. In glibc, we mask AVX etc. if XCR0 indicates it's not available: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/x86/cpu-features.c;h=978eb29f72550deeb237cc76c5cf78c153f0ffb6;hb=7b3d8558d92a123743699c577704aab4a2f3d949#l115 -

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Bring RPM_MASK_RETURN_TYPE in to the signed int range (PR #2459)

2023-04-03 Thread Florian Festi
Merged #2459 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2459#event-8912848488 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint maili

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] x86-64-v3, x86-64-v3 detection must take XCR0 into account (Issue #2463)

2023-04-03 Thread Fabian Vogt
The OSXSAVE bit should be effective for that. glibc doesn't do anything else either. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2463#issuecomment-1494301674 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] x86-64-v3, x86-64-v3 detection must take XCR0 into account (Issue #2463)

2023-04-03 Thread Panu Matilainen
@Vogtinator -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2463#issuecomment-1494289665 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing li

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] x86-64-v3, x86-64-v3 detection must take XCR0 into account (Issue #2463)

2023-04-03 Thread Florian Weimer
The current logic is based solely on CPUID. This is not correct because it does not verify that the software stack (firmware/hypervisor/kernel) supports YMM and ZMM registers. For that, it is necessary to read the XCR0 register using the XGETBV instruction. -- Reply to this email directly or v

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Bring RPM_MASK_RETURN_TYPE in to the signed int range (PR #2459)

2023-04-03 Thread David Cantrell
Updated. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2459#issuecomment-1494250574 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Bring RPM_MASK_RETURN_TYPE in to the signed int range (PR #2459)

2023-04-03 Thread David Cantrell
@dcantrell pushed 1 commit. c9bb079d2b24a980228d7c2acfb4be040d231b5f Remove RPM_MASK_RETURN_TYPE from rpmTagReturnType_e; make it a macro -- View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2459/files/dfe986b9ec9c73d18c2fc9c0139887bc3a35ae4d..c9bb079d2b24a980228d7c2acfb4b

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added more details to the doc about what is returned by the macros '%-x' and '%-x*' (PR #2458)

2023-04-03 Thread Florian Festi
Thanks for the patch! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2458#issuecomment-1494170389 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mai

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] No indication in the doc that the macros '%-x' and '%-x*' return the last occurrence of the specified flag (Issue #2457)

2023-04-03 Thread Florian Festi
Closed #2457 as completed via #2458. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2457#event-8911940983 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rp

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added more details to the doc about what is returned by the macros '%-x' and '%-x*' (PR #2458)

2023-04-03 Thread Florian Festi
Merged #2458 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2458#event-8911940723 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint maili