Closed #2544.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2544#event-9524295387
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-
Thanks for the patch! I applied manully
(8ec9cfc81c3f8326a1c7ee5b795ef517cd48e6b4) to tweak the commit message a little
- it's important to mention the affected subsystem in the summary so people can
immediately tell whether it's relevant to them or not.
--
Reply to this email directly or view
slot1 and slot2 may be NULL
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2544
-- Commit Summary --
* fix:possible null pointer reference
-- File Changes --
M lib/backend/ndb/rpmxdb.c (2)
-- Patch Links --
https://
@Conan-Kudo Is this making any sense?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-6167128
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
When I try to add a plugin that uses strcmp, a core occurs. The stack is as
follows:
```
#0 ...
#1 rpmpluginsCallFsmFilePost()
#2 fsmDoMkdir()
#3 ensureDir()
#4 rpmPackageFilesInstall()
#5 rpmpsmUnpack()
...
#13 rpmInstall()
#14 main()
```
I tried to analyze it and found that the second parameter
Merged #2542 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2542#event-9514648994
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -43,6 +43,15 @@ macros are available:
| %{-f*} | if present at invocation, the argument to the last occurence of
flag f
| %1, %2, ...| the arguments themselves (after getopt(3) processing)
+With rpm >= 4.17 and disabled option processing th
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -43,6 +43,15 @@ macros are available:
| %{-f*} | if present at invocation, the argument to the last occurence of
flag f
| %1, %2, ...| the arguments themselves (after getopt(3) processing)
+With rpm >= 4.17 and disabled option processing th
@rhabacker commented on this pull request.
> @@ -43,6 +43,15 @@ macros are available:
| %{-f*} | if present at invocation, the argument to the last occurence of
flag f
| %1, %2, ...| the arguments themselves (after getopt(3) processing)
+With rpm >= 4.17 and disabled option processing t
Closed #2533.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2533#event-9513257463
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-
Replaced by #2534, thanks for the patch though!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2533#issuecomment-1588867604
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Closed #2532 as completed via df8d1fb1b32becf61bbe0366bd7a1966157bf08f.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2532#event-9513245937
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Merged #2534 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2534#event-9513245357
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -43,6 +43,15 @@ macros are available:
| %{-f*} | if present at invocation, the argument to the last occurence of
flag f
| %1, %2, ...| the arguments themselves (after getopt(3) processing)
+With rpm >= 4.17 and disabled option processing th
Adjusted the docs to the new location and added Resolved tag to the original
ticket in the commit message.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2534#issuecomment-1588856898
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to t
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
252fc02ea530aaa9437f56a7d2e259ee0fbb2298 Add %specpartsdir to macros.in
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2534/files/0e923736841f30d20c29474c79461759b66ac519..252fc02ea530aaa9437f56a7d2e259ee0fbb2298
You are receiving this because
Closed #2528 as completed via #2538.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2528#event-9513165486
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rp
Merged #2538 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2538#event-9513165216
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint maili
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
0e923736841f30d20c29474c79461759b66ac519 Add %specpartsdir to macros.in
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2534/files/ebb9d2010c9dde4e2589bfe71a88c64c1653d169..0e923736841f30d20c29474c79461759b66ac519
You are receiving this because
Let's continue this in the [Fedora
PR](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/pull-request/44), other distros can
and do package things differently so this could get confusing.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2511#issue
Closed #2511 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2511#event-9512958985
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint ma
Thanks @rwmjones and @davidlt for the insight, I had no clue.
@U2FsdGVkX1 - what's the environment you're running into this? If there's an
actual use-case (distro or such) for riscv-32 now, it wouldn't hurt to have
people aware of it.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https
To my knowledge none of main distributions support 32-bit RISCV. OpenEmbedde
definitely has it. Most likely the same applies to Buildroot too. There are no
native riscv32 hardware available that would target Linux to my knowledge. It's
mainly tested with QEMU.
IIRC Alibaba/T-HEAD cores are `CON
I asked @davidlt to take a look, but just a few things ...
We don't use 32 bit RISC-V in Fedora, and don't plan to, so to some extent we
don't care about it. Note that 32 bit RISC-V machines are currently confined
to tiny embedded systems that couldn't possibly run Linux. eg. They lack
usersp
24 matches
Mail list logo
