Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add new plugin slots for pre/post chroot events (PR #2669)

2023-09-19 Thread Florian Festi
Looks good and pretty straight forward. May be should get a test case. It might also be a good idea to point out that these are called even when running without --root. Technically we omit the chroot call in this case but the hoooks are ofc executed no matter what (as they should be) -- Reply

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix tagtbl.C placement in build dir (PR #2670)

2023-09-19 Thread Florian Festi
Merged #2670 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2670#event-10410724809 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM 4.19.0 released! (Discussion #2672)

2023-09-19 Thread Michal Domonkos
This release brings a number of quality-of-life improvements for package authors and maintainers, most notably: * New spec snippet support for [dynamic spec generation](https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/dynamic_specs.html) * New `sysusers.d(5)` integration for automated [user

[Rpm-maint] RPM 4.19.0 released!

2023-09-19 Thread Michal Domonkos
This release brings a number of quality-of-life improvements for package authors and maintainers, most notably: * New spec snippet support for dynamic spec generation * New sysusers.d(5) integration for automated user and group handling * Proper shell-like globbing and escaping in

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Random failure on dependency generation 3 test (Issue #2470)

2023-09-19 Thread Michal Domonkos
Just FTR, I just got this failure *locally* so apparently it's not limited to the CI/Ubuntu environment. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2470#issuecomment-1725217697 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Move checks and package initialization after build (PR #2646)

2023-09-19 Thread Florian Festi
@ffesti pushed 6 commits. 28dbca6a15efdef33863c1412b331279e9ae2853 Drop NVR parameter to make them easier to reuse fb0d81ef9cb886ec31e34c64b13ade85e023b062 Make functions available to be moved later on 7d3d23cd7c13de952be577f47dfad5bfd0bdda74 Move checks and package initialization after

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format, first public draft for commenting (Discussion #2374)

2023-09-19 Thread Zoran Regvart
I wonder if there is room to include software supply chain attestation data in this version? I would like to see [SLSA Provenance](https://slsa.dev/spec/v1.0/provenance) and SBOM (e.g. [SPDX](https://github.com/in-toto/attestation/blob/main/spec/predicates/spdx.md)) support. -- Reply to this