> MANY projects have not updated .po files
I fail to see any relevance to rpm.
In any case, this is supposedly fixed in
b4dc72f4b92489f77de9b0ae0bed754875d37ece.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2817#issuecomment-18953
Closed #2817 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2817#event-11508091602
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint m
I think it's slighly more subtle: whether a file is a %license or not has
little relevance to verify results. However a content mismatch on a %config
file is something entirely different (with possible noreplace/missingok
modifiers) and yet again quite different for a %ghost which can also have
**Describe the bug**
Since upgrading from Fedora 38 to Fedora 39, I cannot create my Oracle Java 8
(i586) packages on my x86_64 host by running rpmbuild via "setarch i386". If I
try to do it, it just does a 64-bit build as if the setarch command hadn't been
used.
In fact, on Fedora 39 with rpm
@pmatilai converted this issue into discussion #2851.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2389#event-11510089819
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Closed #2848.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2848#event-11510440839
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm
Oh indeed. I tweaked the commit message to elaborate on when it happens (this
only affects building from git without doxygen, release tarballs have the html
content prebuilt) and applied manually as commit
6098fe1e9f735ab3a603eb429e01300ae48bf4fe
Thanks for the patch!
--
Reply to this email
@pmatilai requested changes on this pull request.
I came *this* close to merging, but testing made me remember why it's done the
way it is: we want the tarballs always recreated on "dist". With this patch,
that no longer happens.
Of course loops can't be right either, but I can't apply this as-
Just FWIW, https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/22852 describes this
very case.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2820#issuecomment-1895869882
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Mes
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
cd4bd81ad1c446c119a27eec77b2828b5ea1624a Add %__local_file_attrs macro
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2734/files/61bd40a9df5170da6182e560d172fb16f4e3213b..cd4bd81ad1c446c119a27eec77b2828b5ea1624a
You are receiving this because
OK, just hard coding one file attribute doesn't seem like a good idea. I added
a macro that allows you to register an arbitrary number of local file
attributes and generators. I am still wondering if we need a mechanism to avoid
executing generators twice when the package is already installed wh
Looks good to me.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2843#issuecomment-1896120720
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint mailing
i586 <-> i686 is exactly the same class as i586 <-> i686 when the color is zero
for one of the rpms.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2837#issuecomment-1896129493
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
This was lost in autotools -> cmake transition. The particular reason to
make it explicit is that readline is gpl version 3 licensed, and in some builds
components under that license need to be excluded.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-sof
Looks basically correct. Unless this was left out on purpose. Panu?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2852#issuecomment-1896198092
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2853
-- Commit Summary --
* Fix link, declarative builds instead of autobuild
-- File Changes --
M docs/manual/index.md (2)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/rpm-so
Nice find. This is obviously an issue. I just wonder whether the link should be
fixed or if the file should be re-named.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2853#issuecomment-1896498945
You are receiving this because you are s
> MANY projects have not updated .po files (look on
> https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/11338)
Yes, and we don't believe you should be running update-po either.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2817#issuecomment
I have a draft change in https://github.com/teknoraver/rpm/tree/libarchive2
Most of the work needed to be done in `rpmuncompress`, I added a `-p` flag
which does the following:
```
$ tar vtf source-singleroot.tar.gz
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2024-01-16 19:13 source-xx/
-rw-r--r-- roo
> we want the tarballs always recreated on "dist".
Okay, I get that.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2820#issuecomment-1897680855
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
The feature is no longer "autobuild" so there's nothing to rename.
Thanks for the patch!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2853#issuecomment-1897947879
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Messa
Merged #2853 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2853#event-11521499719
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Ack, one of many many many many tiny things that fell through the cracks,
probably a case of "I'll fix this later". Thanks for the patch!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2852#issuecomment-1897951171
You are receiving this
Merged #2852 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2852#event-11521524070
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit.
58b13066e4b540d6440c41becaf3690663cd46d2 Simplify the cache lookup logic, no
functional changes
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2843/files/d23eb53abdde25ad2c45d20c32dde255fb36384d..58b13066e4b540d6440c41becaf3690663cd46d2
You
May be except the link text?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2853#issuecomment-1897972464
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-ma
26 matches
Mail list logo
