Merged #3081 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3081#event-12738970571
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
@pmatilai pushed 2 commits.
28a786b73ead3aba89e2401a98027083b7ffb532 Use an STL vector for the transaction
main rpmte pointer storage
ae207825b46202e62c3da8873ab7feadf18fae31 Convert orderInfo array to a vector
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3081/fil
Merged #3080 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3080#event-12738874129
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Merged #3079 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3079#event-12738873271
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Merged #3078 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3078#event-12738871940
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Merged #3077 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3077#event-12738870990
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Thanks. You are completely right, I misunderstood what is part of the stack is
doing what.
I added the Suggests as suggested, and it works. Thanks again.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3082#issuecomment-2098790412
You
Closed #3082 as not planned.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3082#event-12731802803
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint
This is not a rpm issue. rpm just checks if all dependencies are fulfilled, it
does not choose packages. So you would need to take this to the dnf people who
will tell you to ask the libsolv folks.
Anyway, what happens is that your dependency is basically telling the solver
"either install add-
...plus a bunch of other hashes...
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3077#issuecomment-2098143569
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit.
24b61052131553275d5818e1a47bce6a3c80f7ba Replace dependency lookup cache with
an STL unordered map
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3077/files/cce0bdbc8c1e48cb03bb2905d4c7cbd3340a..24b61052131553275d5818e1a47bce6a3c80f7ba
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/zbyszek/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/commits/post-build-reproducibility-debug
is the branch. The middle commit shows the unexpected behaviour and the third
one is for debugging.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-ma
**Describe the bug**
The docs say:
> `if` - requires the first operand to be fulfilled if the second is (reverse
> implication)
> `if else` - same as above but requires the third operand to be fulfilled if
> the second is not
I added the following to `redhat-rpm-macros`:
> `Requires: (add-determ
...and orderInfo array too
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3081
-- Commit Summary --
* Replace the annoying keyid stash with an STL set
* Use an STL vector for the transaction main rpmte pointer storage
*
It still needs to die, but there's less code that needs dying...
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3080
-- Commit Summary --
* Replace the annoying keyid stash with an STL set
-- File Changes --
M lib/pac
rpmfi always internally stores 64bit sizes since 4.6.0, there's no reason
to do anything else with replaced sizes either.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3079
-- Commit Summary --
* Simplify rpmfi replaced s
A notable difference is that we're now storing the rpmtd structs themselves
in the hash, rather than pointers to them.
A minor side-cleanup is that headerGet() does not return data on failure so
there's no need to free anything in that case.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request o
@pmatilai pushed 2 commits.
85b181479291fa0f1a5a7f202fc1849c998b3faf Natively allocate the main file
trigger structs
cbbfe1ee74859818cf45c4a7b2812541216ef51f Convert packageHash to STL
unordered_map
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3077/files/fb9815b7
18 matches
Mail list logo
