@pmatilai Something is still different between rpm from Fedora 40 and rpm from
Fedora Rawhide when it comes to `--build-in-place`:
Fedora 40:
```
➜ mkosi git:(cache) ✗ mkosi -r 40 --debug-shell -f
Create subvolume '/home/daandemeyer/.cache/mkosi/mkosi-workspace-4b0haoi_/root'
‣ Building default
@dmnks requested changes on this pull request.
(See above)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3198#pullrequestreview-2166296672
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
This only works correctly if the first required macro on the list (the
`*_conf()` variant) is defined. If it's not defined, it will still report
"unknown build system", even if some other required macros is defined (e.g. the
`*_build()` one):
```
$ rpmbuild --define 'buildsystem_foo_conf() %nil
Ufff...
Thanks for the patch!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3201#issuecomment-2217409608
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-
Merged #3201 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3201#event-13438523357
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Closed #3093 as completed via #3189.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3093#event-13438516475
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
R
Merged #3189 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3189#event-13438516207
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
@dmnks commented on this pull request.
> @@ -468,11 +468,13 @@ RPMDB_INIT
RPMTEST_CHECK([
run rpmbuild \
- -ba ${RPMDATA}/SPECS/hello-autopatch.spec
+ -ba ${RPMDATA}/SPECS/hello-autopatch.spec 2> >(grep warning >&2) | grep
warning
What a clever trick :smile:
--
Reply to this email dir
No pressure :)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3202#issuecomment-2217314296
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint mailing li
I'll do that later today.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3202#issuecomment-2217296822
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint
This is failing as follows:
```
6.835 -- Package dependency requirement 'rpm-sequoia >= 1.7.0' could not be
satisfied.
6.835 Package 'rpm-sequoia' has version '1.6.0', required version is '>= 1.7.0'
6.835 CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPkgConfig.cmake:607 (message):
6.835 A requi
As of v1.7.0, `rpm-sequoia` implements `pgpPubkeyMerge`. Bump the minimum
supported version of `rpm-sequoia` to v1.7.0, and replace the `pgpPubkeyMerge`
stub with `rpm-sequoia`'s implementation of `pgpPubkeyMerge`.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github
Meanwhile, closing this one as a dupe of #2877 (documentation will part of the
other ticket as well).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3200#issuecomment-2217226261
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
Closed #3200 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3200#event-13437331237
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint m
Ack, and no problem at all!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3200#issuecomment-2217220385
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-m
> Anyways, I can imagine this is effectively blocking your rpm-sequoia
> development efforts so I'll promote #2877 into our Priority queue so it gets
> handled quicker. Thanks again for chiming in on this! 😄
I've hacked around this for now. As there aren't any other changes on the
horizon for
FYI, I've implemented this in `rpm-sequoia`. The change is part of
[v1.7.0](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm-sequoia/releases/tag/v1.7.0).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3083#issuecomment-2217208334
You are
17 matches
Mail list logo
