Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] fix "no compatible architectures" in riscv32 (PR #2540)

2023-06-13 Thread David Abdurachmanov
To my knowledge none of main distributions support 32-bit RISCV. OpenEmbedde definitely has it. Most likely the same applies to Buildroot too. There are no native riscv32 hardware available that would target Linux to my knowledge. It's mainly tested with QEMU. IIRC Alibaba/T-HEAD cores are `CON

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Support glibc-hwcaps in rpm (Discussion #2022)

2022-12-22 Thread David Abdurachmanov
Note that RISC-V plans to have profiles too (see: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/profiles.adoc ). So right now Linux distributions target RV64GC (which expands to a longer ISA string). That is encapsulated into RVA20 profile. There should be another two RVA22 and RVA23 a bit

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add architecture macro for all RISC-V processors (#1036)

2020-02-03 Thread David Abdurachmanov
Forgot to mention. OpenEmbedded already supports riscv32 IIRC and it also supports RPM packaging. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1036#issuecomment-58139587

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add architecture macro for all RISC-V processors (#1036)

2020-02-03 Thread David Abdurachmanov
32b is a thing even if some distributions don't have current plans to support it. It might be especially popular in buildroot and OpenEmbedded for embedded Linux based RV32 systems, but that markets could be more complicated. I mean most of such available soft cores probably don't support RV32GC