Closed #3316 as completed via #3356.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3316#event-14515340297
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
R
Merged #3356 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3356#event-14515340088
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -288,7 +346,15 @@ rpmRC rpmKeyringVerifySig(rpmKeyring keyring,
> pgpDigParams sig, DIGEST_CTX ctx)
rpmlog(rc ? RPMLOG_ERR : RPMLOG_WARNING, "%s\n", lints);
free(lints);
}
+ if (keyptr) {
+ *keyptr = rp
@ffesti pushed 5 commits.
818162645d3441cd8f8df57331d5e81ba2540808 Add rpmPubkeyFingerprint and
rpmPubkeyFingerprintAsHex
8df52704121eba0b5a45e4d440bb671a8914d509 Add rpmKeyringVerifySig2 that return
the matching primary key
505638062b624b1dc08974b249cc3a9848ce8da2 Add Key Fingerprints to rp
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
>
/* Returned to C, can't use new */
subkeys = (rpmPubkey *)xmalloc(pgpsubkeysCount * sizeof(*subkeys));
- for (i = 0; i < pgpsubkeysCount; i++)
- subkeys[i] = rpmPubkeyNewSubkey(pgpsubkeys[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < pgp
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> {
rpmPubkey *subkeys = NULL;
pgpDigParams *pgpsubkeys = NULL;
int pgpsubkeysCount = 0;
int i;
-if (mainkey && !pgpPrtParamsSubkeys(mainkey->pkt.data(),
mainkey->pkt.size(),
- mainkey->pgpkey, &pgpsubkeys,
@ffesti pushed 7 commits.
4fce6ece30fb5b5385c1b8d39a2e9620224a4ea8 Use long PGP Key IDs for all outputs
536679e4ecd03ec4631b324be60be0cc1a28ec68 Use long PGP Key Ids in our test cases
bb654f2c13ab0be27318d94882f53272742dfd4b Add rpmPubkeyPrimarykey and
rpmPubkeyFingerprint(AsHex)
58d77283fc389
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -288,7 +346,15 @@ rpmRC rpmKeyringVerifySig(rpmKeyring keyring,
> pgpDigParams sig, DIGEST_CTX ctx)
rpmlog(rc ? RPMLOG_ERR : RPMLOG_WARNING, "%s\n", lints);
free(lints);
}
+ if (keyptr) {
+ *keyptr = rp
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -107,6 +117,22 @@ rpmPubkey rpmPubkeyLink(rpmPubkey key);
*/
char * rpmPubkeyBase64(rpmPubkey key);
+/** \ingroup rpmkeyring
+ * Return fingerprint of primary key
+ * @param key Pubkey
+ * @param fp Fingerprint data
+ * @param
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ runroot rpm -U --ignorearch --ignoreos --nodeps \
],
[1],
[],
-[error: /tmp/hello-2.0-1.x86_64-signed.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature,
key ID 1964c5fc: BAD
+[error: /tmp/hello-2.0-1.x86_64-signed.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Sign
@ffesti pushed 5 commits.
b7a81df984de2b993c0eb85cd09a7545d153f8f0 Add rpmPubkeyPrimarykey and
rpmPubkeyFingerprint(AsHex)
c39b607f5344d8cc9f8245c507e783bdbce6ff8b Add rpmKeyringVerifySig2 that return
the matching key
2bc671e4176e6b18005ae125534f34ba5da13633 Add Key Fingerprints to rpmsinfoMs
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> free(pgpsubkeys);
}
*count = pgpsubkeysCount;
return subkeys;
}
+rpmPubkey rpmPubkeyPrimarykey(rpmPubkey key)
+{
+rpmPubkey primarykey = NULL;
+if (key) {
+ wrlock lock(key->mutex);
+ if (key->primarykey == N
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> + * Upstream build scripts using tools like maker, cmake, ant, ...
+ * rpmbuild for running those via a Spec file
+ * Build systems for installing build dependencies and keeping track of build
artifacts
+ * Package repositories offering binary packages
@ffesti pushed 2 commits.
de9ba0e9378f163cf4b30e8b8d789fcd1090198d Reference Manual: RPM's Philosophy
29e22e80c01f012ceeb19c7cc353abebb2561b15 Link philosophy page from
CONTRIBUTING file
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3299/files/9e37b8ef5232c93946b2c
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
>
/* Returned to C, can't use new */
subkeys = (rpmPubkey *)xmalloc(pgpsubkeysCount * sizeof(*subkeys));
- for (i = 0; i < pgpsubkeysCount; i++)
- subkeys[i] = rpmPubkeyNewSubkey(pgpsubkeys[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < pgp
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> {
rpmPubkey *subkeys = NULL;
pgpDigParams *pgpsubkeys = NULL;
int pgpsubkeysCount = 0;
int i;
-if (mainkey && !pgpPrtParamsSubkeys(mainkey->pkt.data(),
mainkey->pkt.size(),
- mainkey->pgpkey, &pgpsubkeys,
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> {
rpmPubkey *subkeys = NULL;
pgpDigParams *pgpsubkeys = NULL;
int pgpsubkeysCount = 0;
int i;
-if (mainkey && !pgpPrtParamsSubkeys(mainkey->pkt.data(),
mainkey->pkt.size(),
- mainkey->pgpkey, &pgpsubkeys,
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
>
/* Returned to C, can't use new */
subkeys = (rpmPubkey *)xmalloc(pgpsubkeysCount * sizeof(*subkeys));
- for (i = 0; i < pgpsubkeysCount; i++)
- subkeys[i] = rpmPubkeyNewSubkey(pgpsubkeys[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < pgp
@ffesti pushed 5 commits.
5c6f832c41535173b012d8046ab4afbe0d32a3d4 Add rpmPubkeyPrimarykey and
rpmPubkeyFingerprint(AsHex)
66759e71a6314b8ed7df79545af08cad93d32ee9 Add rpmKeyringVerifySig2 that return
the matching key
05bae29c7e074f0b00c9409516cf8c45b4ed1655 Add Key Fingerprints to rpmsinfoMs
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
9e37b8ef5232c93946b2c2f1fa137cbf2cd48ddd Link philosophy page from
CONTRIBUTING file
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3299/files/0bc8d9a1c7b5a553cc4340badbfa3414cdba286b..9e37b8ef5232c93946b2c2f1fa137cbf2cd48ddd
You are receivin
Ok, I don't have the mental capacity to make this into a corner stone of
western literature but it should now pass as a piece of our docs.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3299#issuecomment-2384869285
You are receiving this
@ffesti pushed 2 commits.
1b0bc723fd753f7f0e0793ceb477871aeb1b0f44 About Reference Manual
0bc8d9a1c7b5a553cc4340badbfa3414cdba286b Reference Manual: RPM's Philosophy
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3299/files/255a8fa4647ff07a66fb4d63d41c6c54696d3293..0
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ runroot rpm -U --ignorearch --ignoreos --nodeps \
],
[1],
[],
-[error: /tmp/hello-2.0-1.x86_64-signed.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature,
key ID 1964c5fc: BAD
+[error: /tmp/hello-2.0-1.x86_64-signed.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Sign
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -590,9 +615,11 @@ static rpmRC
verifySignature(rpmKeyring keyring, struct rpmsinfo_s *sinfo)
{
rpmRC res = RPMRC_FAIL;
-if (pgpSignatureType(sinfo->sig) == PGPSIGTYPE_BINARY)
- res = rpmKeyringVerifySig(keyring, sinfo->sig, sinfo->ctx
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> {
rpmPubkey *subkeys = NULL;
pgpDigParams *pgpsubkeys = NULL;
int pgpsubkeysCount = 0;
int i;
-if (mainkey && !pgpPrtParamsSubkeys(mainkey->pkt.data(),
mainkey->pkt.size(),
- mainkey->pgpkey, &pgpsubkeys,
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> free(pgpsubkeys);
}
*count = pgpsubkeysCount;
return subkeys;
}
+rpmPubkey rpmPubkeyPrimarykey(rpmPubkey key)
+{
+rpmPubkey primarykey = NULL;
+if (key) {
+ rdlock lock(key->mutex);
+ if (key->primarykey == N
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -107,6 +117,22 @@ rpmPubkey rpmPubkeyLink(rpmPubkey key);
*/
char * rpmPubkeyBase64(rpmPubkey key);
+/** \ingroup rpmkeyring
+ * Return fingerprint of primary key
+ * @param key Pubkey
+ * @param fp Fingerprint data
+ * @param
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -56,6 +56,16 @@ int rpmKeyringAddKey(rpmKeyring keyring, rpmPubkey key);
*/
rpmRC rpmKeyringVerifySig(rpmKeyring keyring, pgpDigParams sig, DIGEST_CTX
ctx);
+/** \ingroup rpmkeyring
+ * Perform combined keyring lookup and signature verification
@ffesti pushed 4 commits.
eb5089121b8b167f6991f95152d55bf2d35c88d3 Add rpmPubkeyPrimarykey and
rpmPubkeyFingerprint
31ede0d1a6a88993bf6208c2b8aa36f7c5b5 Add rpmKeyringVerifySig2 that return
the matching key
906bdae31ac906238c6025d8c824f8f0d24c4f06 Add Key Fingerprints to rpmsinfoMsg()
a42
One way to solve both at the same time would be adding `rpmtsLogOnce()` or
something similar that would solve the general problem of omitting (or
downgrading) log messages after the first one. There are several more use cases
for such an mechanism. There is nothing special about this case here.
Needs to account for #3338, #3339, #3340, #3347
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3342#issuecomment-2382895548
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: _
Pratically we only really support gpg-pubkey packages as storage for pgp keys.
If we support more backends in earnest we need a way to move keys from one
storage backend to another to prevent users needing to re-import the keys.
This should probably be done completely automatically to make trans
Well, if we don't want to use the current fs backend but a new "shared OpenPGP
certificate directory" backend that will probably be a whole set of new
pre-requisites. From skimming through the document I seems to have a signed
"catalog" for the installed keys. I am not sure whether we want to im
Closed #2633 as completed via 7b8ff813efa0e97d27b6779a3daed486a76793b1.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2633#event-14451711223
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
__
Closed #2633 as completed via #3335.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2633#event-14451711166
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
R
Merged #3335 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3335#event-14451710789
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -107,6 +107,22 @@ rpmPubkey rpmPubkeyLink(rpmPubkey key);
*/
char * rpmPubkeyBase64(rpmPubkey key);
+/** \ingroup rpmkeyring
+ * Return fingerprint of primary key
+ * @param key Pubkey
+ * @param fp Fingerprint data
+ * @param
@ffesti pushed 5 commits.
5124ffb1099eab79c968d853748f002af98687bd Add rpmPubkeyPrimarykey and
rpmPubkeyFingerprint
e28395c631795f70c9efa72eb65815e2b9641b56 Rename mainkey to primarykey
d7a9b1d555c78f02970bd4d1e420b9ff545fd209 Add rpmKeyringVerifySig2 that return
the matching key
95ac178247fe
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -107,6 +107,22 @@ rpmPubkey rpmPubkeyLink(rpmPubkey key);
*/
char * rpmPubkeyBase64(rpmPubkey key);
+/** \ingroup rpmkeyring
+ * Return fingerprint of primary key
+ * @param key Pubkey
+ * @param fp Fingerprint data
+ * @param
>From my POV this is now complete.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3321#issuecomment-2376750347
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
OK, back to fingerprints in one piece.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3321#issuecomment-2376746515
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
@ffesti pushed 0 commits.
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3321/files/a06349ba66cb3fe8ee156029829959d1b7f82a7d..a927b9d12e218b77133418ee32d886588eaf9b64
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
_
OK; I put the sub projects into their own tickets and updated the todo list.
#3321 has shown that we are fine with the API of the backends as they are. So
this whole thing is a bit easier than first thought. Next step is teaching
`rpmkeys` to give some useful information on the installed keys (#
Key IDs (even long ones) can have collisions - especially when an attacker
tries to generate them on purpose. The right behavior is to try all keys with
matching key IDs and see if one is able to verify the signature.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm
AC:
* Key stash is moved to a dynamic data type like the rpmts or the keyring
* The key stash is using the long KeyID
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Currently rpmkeys --list only give the version, release and summary of the
gpg-pubkey packages aka short key ID, creation time and issuer. There is now
way to get the fingerprint or even long key ID from RPM for the installed GPG
keys.
Make the current format more useful and also offer a long f
I wonder what's the deal with upper verses lower case hex strings. I split the
fingerprints into groups of four and in lowercase this looks very wrong to me
for some reason. Any opinions on that topic? Looks like RPM has always used
lowercase in one continuous string.
--
Reply to this email di
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
a06349ba66cb3fe8ee156029829959d1b7f82a7d Split PGP fingerprints into groups of
4 characters
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3321/files/a927b9d12e218b77133418ee32d886588eaf9b64..a06349ba66cb3fe8ee156029829959d1b7f82a7d
You are r
@ffesti pushed 4 commits.
6aea28756d11044c69f55ea1c8ba8405195c8ecf Add rpmPubkeyMainKey and
rpmPubkeyFingerprint
d8689a699b58eb380641c582759c924a4f02a877 Add rpmKeyringVerifySig2 that return
the matching key
3a19e3737b7c8f2bd9156453c4cefe0eaf4f5293 Add Key Fingerprints to rpmsinfoMsg()
a927b9
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -319,10 +319,16 @@ rpmRC rpmKeyringVerifySig(rpmKeyring keyring,
> pgpDigParams sig, DIGEST_CTX ctx)
rpmlog(rc ? RPMLOG_ERR : RPMLOG_WARNING, "%s\n", lints);
free(lints);
}
-}
-
-if (keyring)
+ if (keyptr
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> free(pgpsubkeys);
}
*count = pgpsubkeysCount;
return subkeys;
}
+
+int rpmPubkeyFingerprint(rpmPubkey key, uint8_t **fp, size_t *fplen)
+{
+if (key == NULL)
+ return -1;
+key = key->mainkey;
+pthread_rwlock_rdl
@ffesti pushed 6 commits.
a9202d26b33e7c40bab0c467969fdb74a6029178 Use long PGP Key IDs for all outputs
c48d695487fe93cb6d441f51b573d934d61bf527 Use long PGP Key Ids in our test cases
12cbbcc23a71168af83c8c9f80f6b984847a130b Add rpmPubkeyMainKey and
rpmPubkeyFingerprint
cc6bd70a7cef0caad8ecc08
Yup, this is why there is a loop. Otherwise we'd encounter dangling symlinks
that won't get deleted.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3311#issuecomment-2373422407
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this th
Patch itself looks good. @pmatilai is this what you had in mind?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3324#issuecomment-2371087804
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
Yes, but does it process all links before all regular files?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3311#issuecomment-2371074501
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -353,13 +353,13 @@ Checking for key:
Version : eb04e625
Checking package after importing key:
/data/RPMS/hello-2.0-1.x86_64-signed-with-subkey.rpm:
-Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 1f71177215217ee0: OK
+Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signa
Closed #1096 as completed via #3318.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1096#event-14378750857
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
R
Merged #3318 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3318#event-14378750603
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -304,10 +319,16 @@ rpmRC rpmKeyringVerifySig(rpmKeyring keyring,
> pgpDigParams sig, DIGEST_CTX ctx)
rpmlog(rc ? RPMLOG_ERR : RPMLOG_WARNING, "%s\n", lints);
free(lints);
}
-}
-
-if (keyring)
+ if (keyptr
@ffesti pushed 3 commits.
080f73d3b3f60045c8dc44c4256d1e37ec1ef0d9 Add rpmKeyringVerifySig2 that return
the matching key
f50252ce40039e6b4942988f1eaee98c21f55827 Add Key Fingerprints to rpmsinfoMsg()
6721c185060181d0af37e9f9472d58ceed91e704 Don't print key ID if we have the key
fingerprint
-
Merged #3270 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3270#event-14367671616
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
I have added these changes to #3321. So it is redundant now. Closing.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3292#issuecomment-2368874403
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: _
Closed #3292.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3292#event-14367634542
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm
Merged #3325 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3325#event-14367583163
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Merged #3326 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3326#event-14367567035
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> free(pgpsubkeys);
}
*count = pgpsubkeysCount;
return subkeys;
}
+
+int rpmPubkeyFingerprint(rpmPubkey key, uint8_t **fp, size_t *fplen)
+{
+if (key == NULL)
+ return -1;
+key = key->mainkey;
+pthread_rwlock_rdl
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -305,13 +306,30 @@ const char *rpmsinfoDescr(struct rpmsinfo_s *sinfo)
char *rpmsinfoMsg(struct rpmsinfo_s *sinfo)
{
char *msg = NULL;
+char *fphex = NULL;
+char *fpmsg = NULL;
+if (sinfo->rc == RPMRC_OK && sinfo->key) {
+ uin
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -591,9 +609,11 @@ static rpmRC
verifySignature(rpmKeyring keyring, struct rpmsinfo_s *sinfo)
{
rpmRC res = RPMRC_FAIL;
-if (pgpSignatureType(sinfo->sig) == PGPSIGTYPE_BINARY)
- res = rpmKeyringVerifySig(keyring, sinfo->sig, sinfo->ctx
@ffesti pushed 2 commits.
44ef3bc1dabd7b2f5d4d653afa78db2292466071 Add rpmKeyringVerifySig2 that return
the matching key
0352deffbefd673a97e4178481fa0a917081dea6 Add Key Fingerprints to rpmsinfoMsg()
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3321/files/7f8d5c1c
@ffesti commented on this pull request.
> @@ -107,6 +117,15 @@ rpmPubkey rpmPubkeyLink(rpmPubkey key);
*/
char * rpmPubkeyBase64(rpmPubkey key);
+/** \ingroup rpmkeyring
+ * Return fingerprint of primary key
+ * @param key Pubkey
+ * @param fp Fingerprint data
+ * @param
OK, put https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3292 underneath,
adjusted the message and the name of `rpmPubkeyFingerprint` and make the test
cases pass.
For now I have not remove the key IDs from the messages. I wonder if keeping
them is more backward compatible. While they are te
@ffesti pushed 5 commits.
b2e11786497a89e035ef2fed224f4fa67b607e1c Use long PGP Key IDs for all outputs
970b708e3a3fab4bb4802cca84a9d403a57bacd9 Use long PGP Key Ids in our test cases
bbc00e4b09e06d57772c4766acd876ef7b8b1184 Add rpmPubkeyFingerprint
760f81e6a918460835faddf8b6591b57aad9cbe3 Add
Turns out we actually can output the fingerprints without changing the backends.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3292#issuecomment-2365035964
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: __
This does not yet adjust the test cases. So 198 209 216 217 220 221 222 223 226
227 are failing due to unexpected key finger prints.
Can probably be used in combination with #3292 as this does not touch the keyid
output. Although we might want to skip the key id for verified signatures.
Related
Closed #1107 as completed via a76ef22c8f744fc2deaec2c578ec2fd46e552943.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1107#event-14325435393
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
__
Closed #1107 as completed via #3305.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1107#event-14325435367
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
R
Closed #3306 as completed via 1fbf8aeb4e78b8b4afeeaafcbc97b3cbf7cfeaba.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3306#event-14325435517
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
__
Merged #3305 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3305#event-14325434974
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Commit messages of the first patch talks about versions before 4.0.2 while
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3305/commits/3e24b095c7ce0397c6211d2cebe5530154ef13fc
says "the immutable region as we know it appears in commit
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/7d
OK, I guess I am not quite getting this sub key business yet. Doesn't the
signature list the KeyId of the subkey it was created with? Or does it point to
the main key and assumes the subkey will be found there?
After looking at this overall mess we figured a way to solve a lot of the
issues wi
Loop and test case added.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3311#issuecomment-2358276779
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
4936c42b4d8ed68af45fe220d24b2a69baaf9676 brp-remove-la-files: Remove symlinks,
too
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3311/files/8fc4e71f9b51438f09c8206ceb1b407bbaca8aab..4936c42b4d8ed68af45fe220d24b2a69baaf9676
You are receiving
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
8fc4e71f9b51438f09c8206ceb1b407bbaca8aab brp-remove-la-files: Remove symlinks,
too
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3311/files/7fd4312b5f811152f302406b0a0275edb12a9108..8fc4e71f9b51438f09c8206ceb1b407bbaca8aab
You are receiving
Can you please test if the PR linked above fixes your issue? Thanks!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3304#issuecomment-2355385569
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
As we check for file contents delete symlink before looking at regular files.
Resolves: #3304
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3311
-- Commit Summary --
* brp-remove-la-files: Remove symlinks, too
-- File Ch
Looking at the code and the history it looks like it always just matched
against regular files. We probably could add another run that matches symlinks
only before deleting the regular files. That way we can check the files being
linked to to be proper libtool library files.
--
Reply to this e
Here my findings so far:
### PGP KeyID and FingerPrint usage in RPM
* PGP Fingerprint: 20 or 32 bytes hash of public key (depending on key
algorithm)
* (Long) KeyId: last 8 bytes of Fingerprint
* Short KeyId: last 4 bytes of Fingerprint
Short KeyId is prone to (accidental) collisions
Long KeyI
Merged #3293 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3293#event-14246487852
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Closed #1292 as completed via #3293.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1292#event-14246488062
You are receiving this because you commented.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mailing lis
This results in messages like `MD5 digest: NOTFOUND` which is confusing as the
MD5 sum may just be there RPM is just not looking for it. We should at least
give a message that shows we didn't even look - or may be give the status and
state that it is ignored. Not sure if this is possible with th
I wonder if messages like "MD5 digest: NOTFOUND" are really thing to do if we
don't even look at those checksums. It's not that they were not found they were
not looked for. May be we need a different message for when we ignore them.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https:/
Closed #3248 as completed via d99186f2ef6fc0dfaaefe599a98492a84fd18940.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3248#event-14245497584
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
__
Closed #3248 as completed via #3282.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3248#event-14245497561
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
R
Merged #3282 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3282#event-14245497357
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Closed #3290 as completed via #3296.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3290#event-14245298153
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
R
Merged #3296 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3296#event-14245297793
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
Thanks a lot! Good to have a native speaker reading over this. Added the
suggested changes.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3299#issuecomment-2346182247
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Me
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
255a8fa4647ff07a66fb4d63d41c6c54696d3293 Reference Manual: RPM's Philosophy
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3299/files/2efe3cfb546c4f9bed0d5a8c9ab99463991d6bf8..255a8fa4647ff07a66fb4d63d41c6c54696d3293
You are receiving this bec
@ffesti pushed 1 commit.
2efe3cfb546c4f9bed0d5a8c9ab99463991d6bf8 Reference Manual: RPM's Philosophy
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3299/files/82a40f72c7574400c0f7995a7497b538ca566861..2efe3cfb546c4f9bed0d5a8c9ab99463991d6bf8
You are receiving this bec
First brain dump.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3299
-- Commit Summary --
* About Reference Manual
* Reference Manual: RPM's Philosophy
-- File Changes --
M docs/CMakeLists.txt (2)
A docs/manual
1 - 100 of 1083 matches
Mail list logo
