> Actually, srpm are _almost_ arch-independent. I know of two issues: the ARCH
> tag, and BuildRequires. But Fedora packaging guidelines actually forbid
> archful BuildRequires
> (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_buildrequires_and_isa,
> "SRPMs need to be architecture
Agreed with @keszybz here. The tooling can (and should) be updated. If
anything, it should be done to prove that building SRPMs on different platforms
is indeed deterministic.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2601#issuec
when building a source RPM, the username and filesystem permissions from the
build host are preserved and end up propagating to a machine you extract them
onto, e.g.. To be able to reproduce SRPMs, we should have predictable
conventions for the permissions and ownership of files.
The idea we ha
