This was briefly discussed on
[discuss.ocaml.org](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/what-runtime-dependencies-are-stored-in-cmxs-files-and-in-applications-using-those-cmxs-files/8699)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#913 was merged into 4.16 and 4.17. I think this fix should be backported to
these branches.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1814#issuecomment-953019967
Adjust ocamldeps, do nothing with cmxs files.
Fixes: a6fe37c39b39acbcbd014dd1e6d5653ff84254a1
Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de>
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1814
-- Commit Summary --
*
Well, of course it is supposed to be `magic && path`. Are you saying rpm can
not do that?
And if it can do `&&`, how?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/117
Such existing flags to pass options to a script do still work. The existing
known flags are handled.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1070#issuecomment-59704
The evaluation order of `*.attr` files has nothing to do with how ocaml files
are handled.
It would certainly be nice if non-rpm helpers could easily replace existing rpm
helpers.
But this is way off-topic.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
Will you guys please discuss and perform any separation of language support in
a separate SR, please?!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1070#issuecomment-58
@olafhering pushed 1 commit.
dddabb30a808a803d00d9543f09cf201eae85102 update OCaml requires/provides to
cover also cmx
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1070/files/9f04b41e653da201a6350b0
@olafhering pushed 1 commit.
9f04b41e653da201a6350b00482309d4be272519 update OCaml requires/provides to
cover also cmx
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1070/files/03ff54739629181e9877920
> While we are on it, shouldn't we move these to rpm-extras?
That is up to you guys. But this must be a separate SR.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1070#is
olafhering commented on this pull request.
> +}
+#
+#
+usage() {
+echo >&2 "Usage: ${0##*/} -prov|-req [-f 'ocamlobjinfo cmd']"
+}
+#
+mode=
+ignore_implementation_a=()
+ignore_interface_a=()
+while test "$#" -gt 0
+do
+ : "${1}" "${2}"
+ case "${1}" in
+-prov) mode='prov' ;;
+-req
ique. Therefore this dependency is no longer created. The
option -c, which excluded this dependency, is still recognized.
Fixes #913
Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de>
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pu
In which order is `/usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/*.attr` evaluated? Is there a safe
way to override the content of `%_rpmconfigdir/fileattrs/ocaml.attr` (part of
rpm.rpm) with another file from my own `ocaml-rpm-macros.rpm` package?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
One the other hand: are these cmxs files are really supposed to be stand-alone?
If they were in the -devel.rpm along with their cm* siblings, the issue would
not exist.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https:
Sure. Will replace the greppery with awkery.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/913#issuecomment-545881682___
Rpm-
I do not know much about OCaml *.cmxs files. According to `ocamlobjinfo
/usr/lib64/ocaml/unix.cmxs` this file expects a certain hash of other functions
provided by other OCaml libraries. I am sure if these functions change the
`*.cmxs` library can not be used anymore, just like an ordinary ELF f
It is valid to list files and provides of an uninstalled pkg. This broke
recently, likely with 4.14.1:
# rpm -q rpm
rpm-4.14.1-2.1.x86_64
Distribution: openSUSE Tumbleweed
# zypper -n in -ydD libfdt-devel
# rpm -qpliv --provides
/var/cache/zypp/packages/oss/suse/x86_64/libfdt-devel-1.4.4-1.
17 matches
Mail list logo
