Closed #361 via 449ed5d9d772d588566748c26ead8c8fbaae71e1.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
This seemed like the intended approach from the start since building the
systemd_inhibit only depends on DBUS and nothing else does (enable_plugins has
no granularity the way it's implemented). If there is a preferred way to
implements this, then please do, because the current build logic is
pmatilai requested changes on this pull request.
NAK in this form, see comments by @ffesti
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Name and description are beside the point. This is should not be about dbus
support but about whether to build the dbus-inhibit-plugin.
The check should still honour the enable_plugins setting and not requiring dbus
if plugins are not enabled.
--
You are receiving this because you are
ignatenkobrain approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/361#pullrequestreview-77534527___
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/361
-- Commit Summary --
* Do not automagically depend on dbus
-- File Changes --
M configure.ac (7)
-- Patch Links --
