Merged #2906 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2906#event-11874927721
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint mail
This isn't the only place where a misplaced %config can yield weird results
though. I think we should just strip the %config bit out from the file flags
entirely, in rpmfilesPopulate() probably. Kinda like we fixup missing rpmlib()
flags in rpmdsNewPool().
--
Reply to this email directly or vi
Tested locally with mystery package that shall not be named
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2906#issuecomment-1943236369
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
To answer the question: We really shouldn't!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2906#issuecomment-1942018096
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: _
%config is only allowed for regular files and links. While rpmbuild won't
produce package with other files with %config other tools might. Handle these
cases gracefully by ignoring the %config flag.
Resolves: #2890
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github