How i could miss the presence of that option? Then unlike what i wrote,
"_Option missing from RPM(8), 09 June 2002_", it was present. It would be worth
to have an explicit description such as one that takes in account your
statement "_rpm -qp queries a local .rpm file_". Would the following
fo
How i could miss the presence of that option? Then unlike what i wrote,
"_Option missing from RPM(8), 09 June 2002_", it was present. It would be worth
to have an explicit description such as one that takes in account your
statement "_rpm -qp queries a local .rpm file_". Would the following
fo
Note that Max-rpm hasn't been updated in like twenty years. It's interesting as
historical reference, but you don't want to rely on that for documentation.
>From rpm (8):
```
-p, --package PACKAGE_FILE
Query an (uninstalled) package PACKAGE_FILE. The PACKAGE_FILE
rpm -qp queries a local .rpm file, 'dnf repoquery' doesn't download one for you.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2381#issuecomment-1419096159
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Closed #2381 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2381#event-8447533161
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint ma
```
$ rpm -q rpm
rpm-4.18.0-1.fc37.x86_64
```
Attestation of availability of a package: with `dnf`
```
$ dnf -q rq --repo=fedora libvirt-client
libvirt-client-0:8.6.0-3.fc37.x86_64
```
Hello. Opening of package failing.
```
$ rpm -vv -qip `dnf -q rq --repo=fedora libvirt-client`
error: open of libv
