On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:25:44AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Apart from the parsePreamble.c hunk not applying (patch apparently
> against 4.9.x) and two little thinkos wrt rpm typedef braindamage
> (Header is already a pointer so you need "Header h", not "Header *h"
> typically), yes this
On 04/23/2012 11:25 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/20/2012 06:05 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:43:10PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Of course we can just slap in a new rpmlib() dependency for packages
with tilde in the version, that'll at least prevent older rpm's g
On 04/20/2012 06:05 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:43:10PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Of course we can just slap in a new rpmlib() dependency for packages
with tilde in the version, that'll at least prevent older rpm's getting
confused and provide a hint to users that
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:43:10PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Of course we can just slap in a new rpmlib() dependency for packages
> with tilde in the version, that'll at least prevent older rpm's getting
> confused and provide a hint to users that it requires a newer rpm.
> This ignores the
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:43:10PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Of course we can just slap in a new rpmlib() dependency for packages
> with tilde in the version, that'll at least prevent older rpm's getting
> confused and provide a hint to users that it requires a newer rpm.
> This ignores the
On 03/21/2012 06:05 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
On 20 March 2012 10:44, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For download information and further details, see the draft release notes:
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.0
Build (actually tests) failed on non selinux systems:
for d in /proc /sys /selinux /etc
On 03/20/2012 12:51 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
Hi Panu!
Hi, and sorry about the late reply.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It's that time again, just a bit later than originally planned.
A new major release is coming up and while this could be considered
On 20 March 2012 10:44, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> For download information and further details, see the draft release notes:
> http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.10.0
Build (actually tests) failed on non selinux systems:
for d in /proc /sys /selinux /etc/selinux; do [ -d ${d} ] && ln -s
${d} testing/
Hi Panu!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> It's that time again, just a bit later than originally planned.
> A new major release is coming up and while this could be considered a
> rather boring release in terms of new features, there's been quite an
> amount of
It's that time again, just a bit later than originally planned.
A new major release is coming up and while this could be considered a
rather boring release in terms of new features, there's been quite an
amount of internal churn so beginning at alpha, just in case. Unless
something totally une
10 matches
Mail list logo
