On 12/20/2010 06:07 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:13:38PM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:44:53AM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
- tilde support in version comparison
- triggers on provides instead of package names
- weak dependencies (basic
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:13:38PM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:44:53AM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> > - tilde support in version comparison
> > - triggers on provides instead of package names
> > - weak dependencies (basically just parsing them and storing them
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Michael Schroeder (m...@suse.de) said:
> > As we're doing a major release, what are your thoughts on the
> > following features:
>
> My pet idea is an informational tag is a tag that defines a package
> as either multilib or not-multilib, for use by
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:44:53AM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> - tilde support in version comparison
> - triggers on provides instead of package names
> - weak dependencies (basically just parsing them and storing them
> in the rpm header)
> - defining some tag where yum/zypp/smart can stor
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:55:17PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:48:08AM +0200, Panu Matilaine
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:55:17PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:48:08AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > > If you have time to look at the more than one tilde
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:55:17PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:48:08AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > If you have time to look at the more than one tilde-case, then please do.
> >
> > Okey, I'll send a patch
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:48:08AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > If you have time to look at the more than one tilde-case, then please do.
>
> Okey, I'll send a patch later this day.
Cool.
> > As for the compatibility tracking and all that:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:48:08AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> If you have time to look at the more than one tilde-case, then please do.
Okey, I'll send a patch later this day.
> As for the compatibility tracking and all that: looking at the options,
> it'd probably only create a much bigge
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:18:46PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> > > - tilde support in version comparison
> >
> > No fundamental objections, it'd simplify packaging of pre-release versions
> > a
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:18:46PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> > - tilde support in version comparison
>
> No fundamental objections, it'd simplify packaging of pre-release versions
> a great deal. The current suggested patch has some issues tho
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 09:46 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 15:18 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > - tilde support in version comparison
> >
> > No fundamental objections, it'd simplify packaging of pre-release versions
> > a great deal. The current suggested patch has some is
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 15:18 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > - tilde support in version comparison
>
> No fundamental objections, it'd simplify packaging of pre-release versions
> a great deal. The current suggested patch has some issues though, see
> http://rpm.org/ticket/56#comment:6
>
> I d
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:00:48PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > We're closing in on another major RPM release, and compared to 4.7 and 4.8
> > the number of changes is so much bigger that we're starting with an alpha
> > release instead of goi
On 11/22/2010 04:35 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
My pet idea is an informational tag is a tag that defines a package
as either multilib or not-multilib, for use by distribution compose
tools for packages to potentially opt-in or opt-out of whatever
heuristics that such tools use.
From a rpm develop
Michael Schroeder (m...@suse.de) said:
> As we're doing a major release, what are your thoughts on the
> following features:
My pet idea is an informational tag is a tag that defines a package
as either multilib or not-multilib, for use by distribution compose
tools for packages to potentially op
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 22:52 +0200, Anssi Hannula wrote:
> On 19.11.2010 12:44, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:00:48PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> We're closing in on another major RPM release, and compared to 4.7 and 4.8
> >> the number of changes is so much bigger
On 19.11.2010 12:44, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:00:48PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> We're closing in on another major RPM release, and compared to 4.7 and 4.8
>> the number of changes is so much bigger that we're starting with an alpha
>> release instead of going d
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:00:48PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> We're closing in on another major RPM release, and compared to 4.7 and 4.8
> the number of changes is so much bigger that we're starting with an alpha
> release instead of going directly to beta, just in case.
As we're doing a ma
We're closing in on another major RPM release, and compared to 4.7 and 4.8
the number of changes is so much bigger that we're starting with an alpha
release instead of going directly to beta, just in case.
Some of the bigger changes include:
- Obsoletes are now handled more like conflicts: rpm
20 matches
Mail list logo
