On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Sriram Narayanan sri...@belenix.orgwrote:
What's your rpmdb path ?
Please see the error:
rpmdb: stat: /tmp/usr/local/rpm5/__db.Basenames: No such file or directory
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, bishwajit goswami
bswjt.callmeb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
What's your rpmdb path ?
Please see the error:
rpmdb: stat: /tmp/usr/local/rpm5/__db.Basenames: No such file or directory
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, bishwajit goswami
bswjt.callmeb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We use Berkley DB 4.8 for some DB transactions. The DB utilities are
already
-manager
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sriram Narayanan sri...@belenix.org
Date: Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:54 PM
Subject: Fwd: About dpkg and apt-get
To: Belenix Developers belenix-...@opensolaris.org
All:
Summary: I asked Garrett D'Amore of Nexenta/Illumos on Nexenta's
choice of using dpkg
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
An acknowledgement to all your responses here, thanks.
Not much to discuss. It's nobody's business but mine, no community there
at all,
just a bunch of gawking gossiping phear mongering and FUD sucking paparazzi
...
Is there some form of yum support in rpm5 ?
Please let me know in case my question is illogical !
-- Sriram
==
Belenix: www.belenix.org
__
RPM Package Managerhttp://rpm5.org
Should we consider createrepo or does rpm5 provide something that's equivalent ?
Would this be usable by yum ?
-- Sriram
==
Belenix: www.belenix.org
__
RPM Package Manager
Hi everyone:
I'm asking this question here since there are many distribution
builders on this list.
I'm having a discussion with some colleagues about the merits of
installing native libraries via a package manager than by compiling
source on production.
Compiling source on production is how
Just wanted rpm5 users to know that the Belenix team is making
progress with using rpm5 :)
-- Sriram
-- Forwarded message --
From: Moinak Ghosh moin...@belenix.org
Date: Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:21 PM
Subject: [belenix-discuss] Progress :: Fwd: [belenix-notify] SF.net
SVN:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
All macros in configuration file loads have to start with '%' in
1st column.
So you need this
%_topdir /workspace/rpmwork
Thanks Jeff, that worked !
-- Sriram
hth
73 de Jeff
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
snip/
(aside)
FYI: I'm very likely to change to the above as default
hierarchy in rpm-5.4.x, largely because @rpm.org changes with
~/rpmbuild/* already have changed RPM's default behavior,
and I see no reason to maintain
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:12 AM, pinto.e...@gmail.com
pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Great notice, i am glad as old Svr4 admin, other that doing part of rpm5.
Best regards
Sorry, I didn't understand that well :)
Are you not happy that we're moving away from svr4 ? We're moving away
because svr4
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Jeff Johnson n3npq@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 5, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
Folks:
Here's the latest on Belenix using rpm5 :)
Nice!
Note that I can/will re-enable the OpenIndiana buildbot on
http://eastham.rpm5.org:8010
Hi:
This is a newbie question. I'm facing an error about rpmmtree while
trying to build rpm5, and I'll ask that question on the devel list.
But as a newbie, I wanted to know what rpmmtree is for. I'm unable to
find anything meaningful on the web.
Thanks.
-- Sriram
Belenix: www.belenix.org
Hi:
This is a newbie question. I'm facing an error about rpmmtree while
trying to build rpm5, and I'll ask that question on the devel list.
But as a newbie, I wanted to know what rpmmtree is for. I'm unable to
find anything meaningful on the web.
Thanks.
-- Sriram
Belenix: www.belenix.org
Narayanan sri...@belenix.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Sep 6, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
Hello:
I'm one of the team members of the Belenix Distro (www.belenix.org).
We are presently using the SVR4 package format, and have
Hello:
I'm one of the team members of the Belenix Distro (www.belenix.org).
We are presently using the SVR4 package format, and have wanted to
move to a more modern day package format.
We are very likely to use rpm5 as our package system :) We intend to
bundle both yum and smart, and will leave
16 matches
Mail list logo