Jarod Wilson wrote:
I can certainly try to help provide some insight into things based on my
own experiences doing a non-Fedora-branded respin... (MythDora 5 being
essentially Fedora 8 + multimedia bits and all, with a Fedora 9 or
10-based version currently in the works).
Great. Is MythDora, a l
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 09:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> KH KH wrote:
> > I don't know if Thorsten ever mention such "spin" but having both
> > rpmfusion and fedora on the same media is a very hard legal issue.
> > Actually that's even not possible at all without removing the name
> > Fedora from
KH KH wrote:
I don't know if Thorsten ever mention such "spin" but having both
rpmfusion and fedora on the same media is a very hard legal issue.
Actually that's even not possible at all without removing the name
Fedora from such spin. (meaning removing artworks and some others
packages i don't r
CC'ing the Fedora Spins SIG mailing list as this concerns most of the
subscribers there as well.
KH KH wrote:
2008/8/26 Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I have been keep a tab on rpmfusion progress by reading the archives and it
seems the repository is getting reading for launch soon.
2008/8/26 Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I have been keep a tab on rpmfusion progress by reading the archives and it
> seems the repository is getting reading for launch soon. Congrats on that.
>
> My primary interest here at the moment is creating a spin based on rpmfusion
> and Fe
