[Bug 167] Review request: anyremote-J2ME-client - J2ME client for anyRemote

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167 --- Comment #2 from anyremote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-20 08:06:16 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm not that familiar with java anymore these days. Do you mean a srpm with > prebuild versions of Sun WTK and Proguard that will get used for

[Bug 25] truecrypt - Free Open-Source Disk Encryption Software

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25 Till Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- C

Re: Adobe Flash package (was Re: suns' java leagal issues)

--- On Wed, 11/19/08, مؤيد السعدي wrote: > > So shall we ask Adobe for a special permission? Note > that, although our > > chances of an approval are quite slim, asking > won't hurt. > > > > And is there anyone who wants to take the lead? > > > > -oget > > > maybe it's much easier to ask them

Re: Adobe Flash package (was Re: suns' java leagal issues)

> So shall we ask Adobe for a special permission? Note that, although our > chances of an approval are quite slim, asking won't hurt. > > And is there anyone who wants to take the lead? > > -oget > maybe it's much easier to ask them to fix their .spec file (then we ask or allow us to fix it)

Re: Adobe Flash package (was Re: suns' java leagal issues)

--- On Wed, 11/19/08, مؤيد السعدي wrote: > > the more serious thing about it is this term in the FAQ > > > Can I make the Adobe Players available directly from > my website? > > No. The Adobe free Player distribution agreement does > not allow you to > distribute the Players from your website.

[Bug 167] Review request: anyremote-J2ME-client - J2ME client for anyRemote

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167 Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 20] Review request: blcr-kmod - kmod for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20 --- Comment #6 from Thorsten Leemhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 20:34:35 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I placed update specs and srpms at > http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/blcr.spec > http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/blcr-0.7.3-1.sr

Re: Hopefully a new member of the team

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Conrad Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 19 November 2008 10:39:40 am Rex Dieter wrote: > > Dejan Lekic wrote: > > > Rex, I think you do not understand what I am saying ... I am willing to > > > develop/maintain packages inside ONE repository (RPMForg

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-11-19

Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 1 dvd95-1.4p0-3.fc9 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fed

RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2008-11-19

Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 8 fglrx-kmod-8.552-1.8.11.fc10.2 madwifi-kmod-0.9.4-60.r3861_20080903.fc10.8 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.15-1.fc10.3 nvidia-96xx-kmo

Re: Hopefully a new member of the team

On Wednesday 19 November 2008 10:39:40 am Rex Dieter wrote: > Dejan Lekic wrote: > > Rex, I think you do not understand what I am saying ... I am willing to > > develop/maintain packages inside ONE repository (RPMForge). I am not > > saying to dump them here and leave. I am trying to explain why I

Re: Hopefully a new member of the team

Dejan Lekic wrote: Rex, I think you do not understand what I am saying ... I am willing to develop/maintain packages inside ONE repository (RPMForge). I am not saying to dump them here and leave. I am trying to explain why I cannot do this in two separate projects (Fedora main repo and RPMFusi

Re: Hopefully a new member of the team

On Wednesday 19 November 2008 10:32:48 am Dejan Lekic wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dejan Lekic wrote: > > > > OK, I am going to put packages and SPEC files somewhere on the web, and > > > >> add a new GIT repository (just SPEC files) and give

Re: Hopefully a new member of the team

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dejan Lekic wrote: > > OK, I am going to put packages and SPEC files somewhere on the web, and >> add a new GIT repository (just SPEC files) and give you information where >> those are and how to access them. After someone r

[Bug 171] New: Review Request: rpmfusion-config-display - tool to manage proprietary graphic drivers

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171 Summary: Review Request: rpmfusion-config-display - tool to manage proprietary graphic drivers Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux

Re: Hopefully a new member of the team

Dejan Lekic wrote: OK, I am going to put packages and SPEC files somewhere on the web, and add a new GIT repository (just SPEC files) and give you information where those are and how to access them. After someone reviews them (if actually RPMFusion guys want to do it) and check whether they ca

Re: Hopefully a new member of the team

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Dejan Lekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 19 November 2008 at 01:30, Dejan Lekic wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejew

Re: Hopefully a new member of the team

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, 19 November 2008 at 01:30, Dejan Lekic wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 16:12,

Re: Adobe Flash package (was Re: suns' java leagal issues)

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:01:36 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 18:24, مؤيد السعدي wrote: >> > >> > Btw, I recently checked adobe's flash agreement. That one definitely >> > forbids redistribution. >> > >> > -oget >> I don't have any

Re: Hopefully a new member of the team

On Wednesday, 19 November 2008 at 01:30, Dejan Lekic wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 16:12, Dejan Lekic wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > w

[Bug 163] Review request: gambatte - An accuracy-focused Game Boy / Game Boy Color emulator

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163 --- Comment #6 from Andrea Musuruane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-19 16:45:04 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I would wait for a reply from spot on > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 before jumping to that > conclusion. It *is

Re: Blog for rpmfusion.org

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Chris did a amazing work in setting up the news site. It seems it runs > fine and the layout is good and resemble the one the wiki uses. > > Can someone please create a DNS entry for news.rpmfusion.org for this > blog? I

Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2008-11-19

On 19.11.2008 16:10, Dejan Lekic wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:08 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: [...] Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 8: rpmfusion-nonfree-release-8-6

Re: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2008-11-19

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:08 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: 8 > >fglrx-kmod-8.543-0.3.8.11beta.fc9.7 >madwifi-kmod-0.9.4-50.r3867_20080924.fc

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-11-19

Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: 12 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-21 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-23 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc9.4 faad2-2.6.1-6.fc9 iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41

RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2008-11-19

Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: 8 fglrx-kmod-8.543-0.3.8.11beta.fc9.7 madwifi-kmod-0.9.4-50.r3867_20080924.fc9.7 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.09-1.fc9.4 nvidia-beta-kmod-177.61.

Re: Blog for rpmfusion.org

Chris did a amazing work in setting up the news site. It seems it runs fine and the layout is good and resemble the one the wiki uses. Can someone please create a DNS entry for news.rpmfusion.org for this blog? I'll set up a link in the wiki after that. I think that everything is ready for a publi

Adobe Flash package (was Re: suns' java leagal issues)

On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 18:24, مؤيد السعدي wrote: > > > > Btw, I recently checked adobe's flash agreement. That one definitely > > forbids redistribution. > > > > -oget > I don't have any problem with flash because adobe provide an official yum > repo for fedora Yes, they do, but their R