http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #7 from Xavier Lamien 2009-01-25 11:12:04 ---
Excellent, let me check that one too.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
Orcan Ogetbil pisze:
> Both sdlmame and sdlmess subpackages have the same summary and
> description. Is that intentional?
>
> -Orcan
>
No, it was an error. Should be fixed now.
Christopher Stone pisze:
> Actually, I would change the Summary field in the sdlmess package to
> say "M.E.S.S." instea
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20
--- Comment #11 from Neal Becker 2009-01-25 15:29:24 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> - you did:
>
> -ExclusiveArch: i586 i686 x86_64 ppc ppc64
> +ExclusiveArch: i586 x86_64 ppc ppc64
>
> That's wrong for the kmod, as you want to have the
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: 5
NEW pgadmin3-1.8.4-5.fc10 : Graphical client for PostgreSQL
NEW sdlmame-data-0129-1.fc10 : Data files for the SDLMAME package
NEW sdlmess-0129-1.fc10 :
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342
Summary: Review request: tivodecode - Convert a .TiVo file from
TiVoToGo to a normal MPEG
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 4
gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.3-2.fc10
gnome-mplayer-0.9.3-2.fc10
NEW picard-freeworld-0.11-4.fc10 : Acoustic fingerprinting for Picard tagger
yabause-
Hi!
It afaics can help a lot to now and then step back for a moment and try
to look with at where we are some distance; after that it's often the
time to think about where we want to be in one, two or five years from
now. I tried to do that over the last few days; find my thoughts below.
One
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-01-25 19:51:07
---
The QUALCOMM license is essentially the SSLeay license:
http://www.sdisw.com/openssl.htm (I recognized the wording of clause 4 of the
QUALCOMM license, including the incorrect referenc
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
It afaics can help a lot to now and then step back for a moment and try
to look with at where we are some distance; after that it's often the
time to think about where we want to be in one, two or five years from
now. I tried to do that over the last few days; fin
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342
--- Comment #2 from Bernard Johnson 2009-01-25
20:55:21 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The QUALCOMM license is essentially the SSLeay license:
I could have looked for ages and never found that! :)
> but my non-lawyer
> reading of the licen
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler 2009-01-25 22:35:13
---
It's not, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213597 .
So it's the QUALCOMM patent which may be an issue depending on how their patent
license is to be interpreted, I gues
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343
Summary: Review request: pdftk - The PDF Tool Kit
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
Jochen Schmitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||343
--
Configure bugmail: http://bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
My name is Jochen Schmitt and I'm a software developer living in
Frankfurt(Main)
germany. I'm 41 years old.
I have packaged several packages for the Fedora collection. A overview
of my work
you may find at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User
On 1/25/09 1:33 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
= Where we are =
Where we are now is a good start and if we continue on the same track, I
think things are only going to get better...
- we started a few months ago and it worked out quite well afaics; right
now the repos and the packages in i
Hans de Goede wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
...
= Where we are =
- we started a few months ago and it worked out quite well afaics;
right now the repos and the packages in it might not be perfect,
but the repos overall were and still are in acceptable good
condition
Yes I'm quite happy
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343
Thorsten Leemhuis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|30 |
--
Configure bugmail: http://bu
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
Thorsten Leemhuis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|343 |
--
Configure bugmail: http://bug
Hi Jochen!
Welcome to RPM Fusion.
On 25.01.2009 23:13, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> [...]
You may find the review at:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343
Because it's may first rpmfusion package I need a sponsor.
Nope, you don't need a sponsor, as all sponsored Fedora package
contr
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343
Orcan Ogetbil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
On 25.01.2009 20:07, Hans de Goede wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> [...]
- since we started we got some new packages and a few new contributors;
that's good, but in fact I had hopped the numbers of new contributors
would be a little bit higher
Your to critical I'm quite happy with the steady
21 matches
Mail list logo
