http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373
--- Comment #1 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-28
15:50:55 ---
Package is almost OK
Problems:
* Package doesn't own directories it creates:
-- /etc/gconf/schemas belongs to GConf2, please add Requires GConf2
-- /usr/share/thumbnailers doesn't
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373
--- Comment #2 from Kevin DeKorte 2009-02-28 16:09:22 ---
The schema errors should be corrected in SVN already. And they do not break the
application, just those types are not handled. I got that list from totem, so
it probably has the same e
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373
--- Comment #3 from Julian Sikorski 2009-02-28 17:12:44
---
Using d-f-v introduces problems:
1.
/home/jsikorski/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nailer-0.4.3-2.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/thumbnailers/video-thumbnailer.desktop:
warning: key "Encoding" in group
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373
--- Comment #4 from Kevin DeKorte 2009-02-28 17:28:16 ---
I think that the .desktop file actually could be dropped. I'm considering
removing it from SVN.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Y
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373
--- Comment #5 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-28
21:08:09 ---
The validation of the desktop file is a must
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files)
Your file is almost valid, except for
'value "X-Thumbnailer" for key "
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406
--- Comment #2 from Stewart Adam 2009-02-28 23:33:08 ---
Done - here's the updated version:
SPEC:
http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-packager/rpmfusion-packager.spec
SRPM:
http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-pack
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
[Catching up on this after a long time so excuse the delay]
- no RPM Fusion Fedora remix maintained within the project; do we
want one? Or even proper install DVDs that already contain packages
from RPM Fusion?
I was very happy to see Rahul do some work here, way to g
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
From: Tom spot Callaway
Well, the issue is that the game is clearly disparaging Microsoft and
its marks. I'm not sure any amount of "artwork" replacement will
overcome that.
WTF, since when is parody illegal? It's even an exception to copyri
