http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527
--- Comment #48 from Zarko Pintar zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-20 08:22:57
---
(In reply to comment #47)
The package looks a lot better in shape now. The remaining problems are:
1- shared-lib-calls-exit
2- the segfaults
3-
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527
--- Comment #49 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-04-20 08:28:18 ---
(In reply to comment #47)
The package looks a lot better in shape now. The remaining problems are:
1- shared-lib-calls-exit
I usually ask upstream whether it is
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't remember reading a discussion about this. Is there anyone who
made some research about OSSv4? I saw some good reviews and some folks
in fedoraforum are asking about it.
Can it be considered for RPMFusion?
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I don't remember reading a discussion about this. Is there anyone who
made some research about OSSv4? I saw some good reviews and some folks
in fedoraforum are asking about it.
Can
2009/4/20 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I don't remember reading a discussion about this. Is there anyone who
made some research about OSSv4? I saw some good reviews and some
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563
David Hlacik da...@hlacik.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||da...@hlacik.eu
---
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563
NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kwiz...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562
NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kwiz...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562
NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562
NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |3
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563
NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |3
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563
NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #27
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563
--- Comment #3 from NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-04-20 15:08:54 ---
1* Does this file remains needed with 9.4? (should be set as %config at least)
%{_sysconfdir}/udev/makedev.d/40-catalyst-dri.nodes
(in other words, Is the module
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476
--- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-04-20
18:44:42 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #5)
* This macro seems not to be used:
%define blend blender-freeworld
* In this macro
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476
--- Comment #10 from Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-20 18:56:17
---
I was passing by and just wanted to stop to say that the new guidelines prefer
usage of %global instead of %define.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476
NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||3
--- Comment #11
Do we really want to install the foo2* packages by default? Isn't there
some kind of automatic printer driver download feature these days that
maybe can be used?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527
--- Comment #50 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-04-21 05:15:15
---
If the package was built against Qt 4.5, it won't run against 4.4.
This is going to become a non-issue very soon as Qt 4.5 is now queued for
stable.
--
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #28 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-21 06:47:30 ---
Thanks for the review Xavier
Package CVS request
==
Package Name: VirtualBox-OSE
Short Description: - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/4/20 Orcan Ogetbil:
OSS has hardware drivers. It comes with bunch of kernel modules.
That would mean backport of already present oss kernel modules or are
theses OSS kernel modules was removed previously and only the compat
layer
On 20.04.2009 05:56, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I don't remember reading a discussion about this. Is there anyone who
made some research about OSSv4? I saw some good reviews and some folks
in fedoraforum are asking about it.
Can it be considered for RPMFusion? Practically, it replaces ALSA, or
maybe
On 20.04.2009 22:44, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Do we really want to install the foo2* packages by default?
I for one prefer if things just work which way more often is the case
if packages and driver get installed by default, even if they are unused.
That option (with the current packaging
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
24 matches
Mail list logo
