Re: Wrong source selected in build

On 08/11/2009 10:27 PM, Adrian Reber wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:52:22PM +0200, Steven Moix wrote: I'm having some trouble with the update of a package (motion). The build process for the devel and F10 branches went fine, but the F11 branch fails miserably due to a wrong source. You can se

Re: Wrong source selected in build

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:52:22PM +0200, Steven Moix wrote: > I'm having some trouble with the update of a package (motion). The build > process for the devel and F10 branches went fine, but the F11 branch > fails miserably due to a wrong source. You can see the error here: > http://buildsys

Wrong source selected in build

Hello all, I'm having some trouble with the update of a package (motion). The build process for the devel and F10 branches went fine, but the F11 branch fails miserably due to a wrong source. You can see the error here: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?email=steven.m...@axian

[Bug 750] Review request: opencore-amr - OpenCORE Adaptive Multi Rate Narrowband and Wideband speech lib

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750 Hans de Goede changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 487] Review request: libmimic - Encoding/decoding library for Mimic V2.x

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487 Hans de Goede changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 750] Review request: opencore-amr - OpenCORE Adaptive Multi Rate Narrowband and Wideband speech lib

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750 --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede 2009-08-11 21:10:34 --- (In reply to comment #7) > > It does, see: > > opencore-amr/opencore/NOITCE > > No, it does not. NOTICE only includes this text: > > With a pointer to the license. > > Fedora gu

[Bug 751] Review request: vboxgtk - A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 --- Comment #14 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-11 18:06:58 --- Package CVS request == Package Name: vboxgtk Short Description: A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox Owners: hicham Branches: F-11 InitialCC: hicham

[Bug 751] Review request: vboxgtk - A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 --- Comment #13 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-11 17:51:02 --- Package CVS request == Package Name: vboxgtk Short Description: A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox Owners: hicham Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hicham ---

[Bug 751] Review request: vboxgtk - A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 --- Comment #12 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-11 17:49:23 --- updated spec and srpm Spec URL : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/vboxgtk.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/vboxgtk-0.5.0-2.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint output: none -- Confi

[Bug 751] Review request: vboxgtk - A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||33 -- Configure bugmail: http://bug

[Bug 751] Review request: vboxgtk - A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-11 17:13:31 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Wouldn't it be sufficient (and much easier on the eyes) to use: > > ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 No. I once thought the same. Plague (somehow incorrect

[Bug 751] Review request: vboxgtk - A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 --- Comment #10 from Todd Zullinger 2009-08-11 17:05:13 --- (In reply to comment #9) > %if 0%{?fedora} > 11 > ExclusiveArch: i686 x86_64 > %else %if 0%{?fedora} > 10 > ExclusiveArch: i586 x86_64 > %else > ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 > %endi

[Bug 751] Review request: vboxgtk - A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|2 |4 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel