http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176
Bug 176 depends on bug 175, which changed state.
Bug 175 Summary: Review Request: viafb - The console framebuffer driver for VIA
graphics
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175
What|Old Value |New
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453
Summary: maia - Email filter with spam and virus scanning support
and a friendly web gui
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/11: 7
catalyst-kmod-9.9-1.fc11.2
nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.20-1.fc11.3
nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.13-1.fc11.3
2009/10/21 Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info:
...
What about all the rebuilds against the new ffmpeg? Shall I just bump
and queue all the packages depending on it to see what breaks?
Yes, packages that weren't already updated need a rebuild.
I guess we need a mass rebuild for the package
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/21 Thorsten Leemhuis :
...
What about all the rebuilds against the new ffmpeg? Shall I just bump
and queue all the packages depending on it to see what breaks?
Yes, packages that weren't already updated need a rebuild.
I guess
Orcan Ogetbil wrote on 21.10.2009 08:46:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/21 Thorsten Leemhuis :
...
What about all the rebuilds against the new ffmpeg? Shall I just bump
and queue all the packages depending on it to see what breaks?
Yes, packages that weren't
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote on 21.10.2009 08:46:
Please let me know when you folks are planning to do this. I need to
update the desktop files of certain multimedia applications to comply
with the FedoraStudio feature of Fedora 12, which I
Orcan Ogetbil wrote on 21.10.2009 09:31:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote on 21.10.2009 08:46:
Please let me know when you folks are planning to do this. I need to
update the desktop files of certain multimedia applications to comply
with the
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: 2
bsnes-0.051-1.fc11
NEW proas-2.1.2-2.fc11 : Planning of astronomical observations
W dniu 21.10.2009 13:19,
rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org pisze:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 11: 2
bsnes-0.051-1.fc11
NEW proas-2.1.2-2.fc11 : Planning of astronomical
Julian Sikorski wrote on 21.10.2009 13:22:
rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org pisze:
[...]
Given that bsnes-0.052 just appeared in free, I think it's time to
remove bsnes from nonfree repositories.
Will vanish from the updates repos for 10 and 11 with the next push.
CU
knurd
Hi!
Could someone (Nicolas?) push nvidia's 190.40 drivers to rawhide?
I've built new RPMs locally based on latest from f11-updates and they've
been working fine for the last few days (and they work with F12's Xserver
ABI changes).
I can also commit the changes I made (basically just bump version
On Oct 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Could someone (Nicolas?) push nvidia's 190.40 drivers to rawhide?
I've built new RPMs locally based on latest from f11-updates and
they've
been working fine for the last few days (and they work with F12's
Xserver
ABI
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802
--- Comment #20 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-10-21
19:00:06 ---
# From e2fsprogs
rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/bin/compile_et
Why do you need a own e2fsprogs during the build step?
# No kernel module cruft in this package
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1
xmms2-nonfree-0.6-3.fc12
Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora -
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/11: 1
bsnes-0.054-1.fc11
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion
W dniu 30.09.2009 09:20, Andrea Musuruane pisze:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com wrote:
I only had a quick look, and the RAR code is the only problematic one,
but it seems that RAR support can be disabled. Does the fact that the
libsnesreader.so is dlopened
Hi!
Some of you might be aware of it, other not, but we afaics have a
(whole) lot of medium-sized and small problems in the infrastructure
area(¹). The main ones from the top of my head:
- our infrastructure team basically consists of just one person: Xavier
Lamien (laxathom/SmootherFrOgZ)
-
On 22.09.2009 20:45, Jack Neely wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:18:43PM +0100, Chris Nolan wrote:
Just a heads up: there has been a lot of user reports of problems
recently with all kmods from rpmfusion.
I haven't quite got to the bottom of it, but essentially it seems that
if you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 21.10.2009 20:27, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
Some of you might be aware of it, other not, but we afaics have a
(whole) lot of medium-sized and small problems in the infrastructure
area(¹). The main ones from the top of my head:
- multiple
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802
--- Comment #21 from Jack Neely jjne...@ncsu.edu 2009-10-21 20:49:56 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
# From e2fsprogs
rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/bin/compile_et
Why do you need a own e2fsprogs during the build step?
I've clarified the
2009/10/21 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net:
Hi!
Could someone (Nicolas?) push nvidia's 190.40 drivers to rawhide?
I've built new RPMs locally based on latest from f11-updates and they've
been working fine for the last few days (and they work with F12's Xserver
ABI
On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/21 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net:
Hi!
Could someone (Nicolas?) push nvidia's 190.40 drivers to rawhide?
I've built new RPMs locally based on latest from f11-updates and
they've
been working fine for the last
On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/21 Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com:
On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/21 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net:
Hi!
Could someone (Nicolas?) push nvidia's 190.40 drivers to rawhide?
I've
Thorsten Leemhuis píše v St 21. 10. 2009 v 20:27 +0200:
Hi!
Some of you might be aware of it, other not, but we afaics have a
(whole) lot of medium-sized and small problems in the infrastructure
area(¹). The main ones from the top of my head:
- our infrastructure team basically consists
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 21.10.2009 20:39, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Am 21.10.2009 20:27, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
Some of you might be aware of it, other not, but we afaics have a
(whole) lot of medium-sized and small problems in the infrastructure
area(¹).
On 21.10.2009 21:20, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/21 Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com:
On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/21 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net:
Could someone (Nicolas?) push nvidia's 190.40 drivers to rawhide?
I've built new RPMs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 21.10.2009 21:22, schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
If the lack of documentation is one of the problems, can we arrange
a time to make a workshop/lecture on IRC, so that people who have
the knowledge could deliver it? I assume that there are various
folks
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803
Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |3
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803
Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
Hi!
Some of you might be aware of it, other not, but we afaics have a
(whole) lot of medium-sized and small problems in the infrastructure
area(¹). The main ones from the top of my head:
- our infrastructure team
2009/10/21 Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info:
On 21.10.2009 21:20, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/21 Jarod Wilson ja...@wilsonet.com:
On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/10/21 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net:
Could someone (Nicolas?) push
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #3 from NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-10-22 00:53:01 ---
For now: Not completely sure, but I don't think so, as the ralink drivers from
Ralink (those oget takes care of for RPM Fusion) are sometimes a bit ahead of
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879
--- Comment #4 from NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-10-22 01:03:56 ---
I meant:
Of course, it will be easier to fetch patches only needed by ralink if they are
keept separate.
It was already too late for me.
--
Configure bugmail:
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 01:13:00 pm Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Am 21.10.2009 21:22, schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
If the lack of documentation is one of the problems, can we arrange
a time to make a workshop/lecture on IRC, so that people who have
the knowledge could deliver it? I assume that
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803
--- Comment #2 from Jack Neely jjne...@ncsu.edu 2009-10-22 06:18:21 ---
The spec file is using the short cut, amazingly. OpenAFS is big, slow to
build, and all around fun to maintain.
--
Configure bugmail:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (EL - nonfree) testing/5: 1
NEW proas-2.1.2-2.el5 : Planning of astronomical observations
Changes
[DOT] info - 1.3.3-5
- rebuild for new ffmpeg
mplayer-1.0-0.110.20091021svn.fc12
--
* Wed Oct 21 2009 kwizart kwizart at gmail.com - 1.0-0.110.20091021svn
- Update to snapshot 20091021
mplayer svn rev: 29776
ffmpeg : HEAD
dvdnav : HEAD
- Move from amrnb amrwb
38 matches
Mail list logo
