On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Justin wrote:
> First, relevant info:
>
> Bug report:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679
>
> IRC convo w/ HandBrake devs:
> http://handbrake.fr/irclogs/handbrake/handbrake20091115_pg2.html
Too bad their logs starts in 2009: I attempted packaging
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:20:38 +0100, Andrea wrote:
>
>> > Fedora Rawhide (-> called "fedora-rawhide" inside the RPM Fusion buildsys
>> > repo definitions) has switched to F-13.
>>
>> In this case we miss F-12, at least in CVS.
>
> Thorsten
When f12 release is official, should preupgrade work, including rpmfusion
(assuming I have enough space in /boot)? I already tried it, and it failed
due to rpmfusion dependencies.
Neal Becker wrote on 16.11.2009 12:32:
> When f12 release is official, should preupgrade work, including rpmfusion
> (assuming I have enough space in /boot)? I already tried it, and it failed
> due to rpmfusion dependencies.
I read that preupgrade should do everything right these days, but I
ne
On 11/16/2009 10:32 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
When f12 release is official, should preupgrade work, including rpmfusion
(assuming I have enough space in /boot)? I already tried it, and it failed
due to rpmfusion dependencies.
Did it fail in the downloading of rpmfusion rawhide packages ?
or while
W dniu 16.11.2009 13:42, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
> Neal Becker wrote on 16.11.2009 12:32:
>> When f12 release is official, should preupgrade work, including rpmfusion
>> (assuming I have enough space in /boot)? I already tried it, and it failed
>> due to rpmfusion dependencies.
>
> I read that
On Monday 16 November 2009, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 16.11.2009 13:42, Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
> > Neal Becker wrote on 16.11.2009 12:32:
> >> When f12 release is official, should preupgrade work, including
> >> rpmfusion (assuming I have enough space in /boot)? I already tried it,
> >> an
Hi! I just installed F12 (from the RC disk) on a new computer, and
discovered that there seem to be packages in the F12 rpmfusion
repositories that are signed with the F11 signing key. The specific
one that I noticed was livna-config-display, which refused to install
until I downloaded and "rpm --i
Mary Ellen Foster wrote on 16.11.2009 14:59:
> Hi! I just installed F12 (from the RC disk) on a new computer, and
> discovered that there seem to be packages in the F12 rpmfusion
> repositories that are signed with the F11 signing key. The specific
> one that I noticed was livna-config-display, whi
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Conrad Meyer wrote on 15.11.2009 21:58:
>> Can you post about what steps were involved in this process?
>
> In Detail: No, as that would take multiple hours. But the rough and
> mostly (not fully) up2date steps can be found on
> http://rpmfusion.org/Infrastructure/Prepa
+1
I would be very willing to contribute time and resources as I am able if
there were docs on how to get involved.
-Adam (From Android - CM)
On Nov 16, 2009 11:44 AM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Conrad Meyer wrote on 15.11.2009 21:58:
>> Can you post about what steps wer
On 11/16/2009 10:18 AM, Justin wrote:
>
>> Yes, I agree. Besides the work of re-branding, it would be my #2 concern in
>> that solution. Having a "Provides: HandBrake" would at least help if
>> someone typed "yum install HandBrake" :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I like that; would it work in KPackageKit/w
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> PackageKit and frontends rely on yum which in turn relies on RPM. So it
> will work everywhere.
No it won't. PK doesn't list virtual Provides.
Kevin Kofler
Kevin Kofler wrote on 16.11.2009 18:43:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
>> Conrad Meyer wrote on 15.11.2009 21:58:
>>> Can you post about what steps were involved in this process?
>> In Detail: No, as that would take multiple hours. But the rough and
>> mostly (not fully) up2date steps can be found o
14 matches
Mail list logo
