Re: [PATCH] kino: port to FFmpeg-0.8 API

2011-09-05 Thread Richard Shaw
I hope no one takes my question the wrong way, but... How many people still use Kino? The last website updated appears to be May 2010 and the last release September 2009. I tried it out but when I found out that it doesn't handle HD video (even my digital camera does 720p clips) I gave up and tha

Re: FFmpeg 0.8.2 and x264 ABI 116 in devel/F-16

2011-09-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/05/2011 02:32 PM, Karel Volný wrote: On Monday 05 of September 2011 13:58:02 Thomas Moschny wrote: 2011/9/5 David Timms: They don't appear in yum --enablerepo=* list ffmpeg (I see: ffmpeg.x86_64 0.7.1-1.fc16 rpmfusion-free-rawhide ) Do we need to wait until it's pushed to rawhide,

Re: [PATCH] kino: port to FFmpeg-0.8 API

2011-09-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Hans de Goede wrote: > The compat header will just make things compile, it replaces > linux/videodev.h, but does not do anything magic to make the app actually > work with v4l2 devices all of a sudden, iow the app will still try to talk > the v4l1 API to any /dev/video nodes. Oh, I didn't notice t

Re: FFmpeg 0.8.2 and x264 ABI 116 in devel/F-16

2011-09-05 Thread Karel Volný
On Monday 05 of September 2011 13:58:02 Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2011/9/5 David Timms : > > They don't appear in yum --enablerepo=* list ffmpeg (I see: > > ffmpeg.x86_64 0.7.1-1.fc16 rpmfusion-free-rawhide ) > > Do we need to wait until it's pushed to rawhide, so that our > > build will pick up th

Re: [PATCH] motion: port to FFmpeg-0.8 API

2011-09-05 Thread Steven Moix
Thanks, I contacted upstream to integrate the modification. On Sep 4, 2011, at 12:06 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Attached. > > -- > Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann > RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu > "Faith manages." >-- Del

Re: FFmpeg 0.8.2 and x264 ABI 116 in devel/F-16

2011-09-05 Thread Thomas Moschny
2011/9/5 David Timms : > They don't appear in yum --enablerepo=* list ffmpeg (I see: > ffmpeg.x86_64  0.7.1-1.fc16  rpmfusion-free-rawhide ) > Do we need to wait until it's pushed to rawhide, so that our build will pick > up the updated ffmpeg ? ffmpeg 0.8.2-1.fc16 is in the "rpmfusion-free-needsi

Re: FFmpeg 0.8.2 and x264 ABI 116 in devel/F-16

2011-09-05 Thread David Timms
On 04/09/11 17:41, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: We don't have "testing" for devel branch, do we? Anyway, the builds are done. They don't appear in yum --enablerepo=* list ffmpeg (I see: ffmpeg.x86_64 0.7.1-1.fc16 rpmfusion-free-rawhide ) Do we need to wait until it's pushed to rawhide

Re: [PATCH] kino: port to FFmpeg-0.8 API

2011-09-05 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 09/05/2011 01:06 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Apart from this patch, kino needs to be ported to v4l2 API as well, as the v4l1 API is already gone from F16+ kernels. One can make it build (as I did) by using the backwards-compatibility header from libv4l (