http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999
--- Comment #6 from NVieville
2011-10-26 20:27:02 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> [...]
>
> The review is the package to be included (again) to rpmfusion, you can
> upgrade to a later version now or later without needing a new review.
>
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998
--- Comment #7 from NVieville
2011-10-26 20:21:52 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> [...]
>
> Remember to update the spec changelog and bump the release when you make
> changes to the spec and build a new SRPM.
Thanks to remember me this
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998
--- Comment #6 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-10-26 19:56:32 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> Thanks! Done!
>
> One question: as you mentioned in your review comments, this version is
> not the very last one (Broadcom publ
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999
--- Comment #5 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-10-26 19:49:01 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks! Done!
>
> One question: as you mentioned in your review comments, this version is
> not the very last one (Broadcom publ
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998
--- Comment #5 from NVieville
2011-10-26 19:25:34 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Thanks! Done!
One question: as you mentioned in your review comments, this version is
not the very last one (Broadcom published the last one yesterday
25/10/201
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999
--- Comment #4 from NVieville
2011-10-26 19:23:41 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thanks! Done!
One question: as you mentioned in your review comments, this version is
not the very last one (Broadcom published the last one yesterday
25/10/201
Question redirected from Review 1998, the spec file contains actually
this directive:
%define buildforkernels newest
But to build the akmod-wl package this one must be set to:
%define buildforkernels current
How do I should set it to meet the akmods rpmfusion standards as this
package provides
> One more question, the spec file contains actually this directive
>
> %define buildforkernels newest
>
> But to build the akmod-wl package this one must be set to:
>
> %define buildforkernels current
>
> How do I should set it to meet the akmods rpmfusion standards as this
> package provides
Thanks! Done!
Same question as for Review 1999 about upstream version of this package!
One more question, the spec file contains actually this directive
%define buildforkernels newest
But to build the akmod-wl package this one must be set to:
%define buildforkernels current
How do I should se
Thanks! Done!
One question: as you mentioned in your review comments, this version is
not the very last one (Broadcom published the last one yesterday
25/10/2011). What should I do to be the most "upstream" as possible?
Open a new review for the upstream version or wait for this one to be
accompli
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998
Tim Lauridsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #4 from Tim Lauridsen
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999
Tim Lauridsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen
> --- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-10-26 17:15:14 ---
> Don't looks like
>
> Source0:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/sources/broadcom/5_100_82_38/hybrid-portsrc_x86_32-v5_100_82_38.tar.gz
> Source1:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/sources/broadcom/
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999
--- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-10-26 18:03:03 ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[!] : MUST - Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999
Tim Lauridsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@rasmil.dk
Blocks|
MythTV build succeeded for F16/devel!
Whooho!
Thanks,
Richard
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998
--- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-10-26 17:15:14 ---
Don't looks like
Source0:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/sources/broadcom/5_100_82_38/hybrid-portsrc_x86_32-v5_100_82_38.tar.gz
Source1:
http://dl.dropbox.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998
--- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen 2011-10-26 17:11:30 ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[!] : MUST - Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
m
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998
Tim Lauridsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@rasmil.dk
Blocks|
Hello list,
> > In short, I wonder it it wouldn't be wise to have this new driver
> > enabled from the stating-kmod than the wl-kmod that might become
> > unmaintained.
>
> For the moment, as shown in this table
> http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/b43#Supported_devices the
> bcm4313 wir
20 matches
Mail list logo
