Hi Steve,
I updated the F-15 branch to DVDStyler 2.0 a little while ago, but the
update has been in updates-testing for the past week or two. It has a patch
for the docs build error as well. You can find the SRPM in the
rpmfusion-free-updates-testing repository [1].
Regards,
Stewart
[1]
Richard Shaw píše v Po 14. 11. 2011 v 16:09 -0600:
Dan,
I'm cleaning up the spec file getting it ready for submission. Are you
interested in reviewing and co-maintaining OCE rather than OCC?
Sure, I am interested. Do you know if there is a clean relation between
OCC releases (and thus API)
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
Richard Shaw píše v Po 14. 11. 2011 v 16:09 -0600:
Dan,
I'm cleaning up the spec file getting it ready for submission. Are you
interested in reviewing and co-maintaining OCE rather than OCC?
Sure, I am interested. Do you know
Hi,
I would be willing to swap a review of gmtk [1] in rpmfusion for another
review, be it RPM Fusion or Fedora, preferably not something overly
complex. Feel free to contact me if you are interested.
Cheers,
Julian
[1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1958
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1958
Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Currently devel builds still pull from f16, rather than f17 Fedora rawhide and
packages still have fc16 in their tags. This should be fixed ASAP, now that
Fedora 16 is in GA.
Also:
common/branches in CVS shows:
devel:rawhide-free:.fc16:fedora:16
that should be:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1958
--- Comment #8 from Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com 2011-11-15 23:59:29
CET ---
Sure, I can drop the f14 stuff. The URL problem is common for google code, I am
not sure what is the reason for it.
I am not sure what you mean by explicit
Hi,
I noticed that the updated common/branches still thinks Rawhide is Fedora
16. Please fix that! (Also check the builder configs, the Rawhide configs
should actually point to Rawhide now.)
On a related note, some packages have been built only for Rawhide and F15,
but not F16:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1958
--- Comment #9 from Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com 2011-11-16 00:11:28
CET ---
New release:
Spec URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/gmtk.spec
SRPM URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/gmtk-1.0.5b1-3.fc16.src.rpm
Changes:
- Removed
I wrote:
On a related note, some packages have been built only for Rawhide and F15,
but not F16:
kdenlive-0.8.2-1.fc16
mlt-0.7.6-1.fc16
thunderbird-enigmail-1.3.3-1.fc16
Also:
bsnes-0.084-1.fc16
In addition, transcode was built with a higher EVR in F16 than in Rawhide
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975
--- Comment #13 from Lionel Félicité deogra...@free.fr 2011-11-16 00:43:04
CET ---
Thanks Richard!
about fdupes, it was originaly in mandriva spec's file. And I wasn't paying
attention if it really did something : it didn't, so I removed it.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975
--- Comment #14 from Lionel Félicité deogra...@free.fr 2011-11-16 00:45:23
CET ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Thanks Richard!
about fdupes, it was originaly in mandriva spec's file. And I wasn't paying
attention if it really did something :
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975
--- Comment #15 from Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-11-16 01:47:42 CET ---
The spec file looks pretty good now. Unfortunately I'm not a sponsor so I can't
do your full review.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975
--- Comment #16 from Lionel Félicité deogra...@free.fr 2011-11-16 08:27:48
CET ---
Leigh Scott, Nicolas Chauvet, Richard : Thanks guys for helping me!
Can anyone sponsor me ?
--
Configure bugmail:
14 matches
Mail list logo
