https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
--- Comment #3 from Matthieu Saulnier casper.le.fan...@gmail.com 2011-12-10
10:33:41 CET ---
Hello,
(In reply to comment #1)
1. Although it's obvious by looking in the spec, make sure you state why this
package isn't allowed in Fedora.
2011/12/10 Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com:
Hi, everybody,
What's needed to get build tools out for el6?
I'm looking to help test the spl/zfs modules on CentOS 6.
I found that
kmodtool
We aren't building kmod for EL-6 but elrepo.org does.
If someone volunteer to catch up to their
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Richard Shaw píše v St 07. 12. 2011 v 15:22 -0600:
Dan,
Are you still interested in reviewing this package?
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054
Version 0.8.0 is about to be released which includes patches I got
upstreamed. (Yay for for packages that build with zero
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036
--- Comment #11 from Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-12-10 14:34:42 CET ---
My apologies!
Thanks for straightening me out as usual Kevin. I see now this isn't the same
situation as a freeworld package.
One question though. As far as the
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/12/10 Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com:
Hi, everybody,
What's needed to get build tools out for el6?
I'm looking to help test the spl/zfs modules on CentOS 6.
I found that
kmodtool
We aren't building
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036
--- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2011-12-10 16:11:03
CET ---
We can normally assume that a library with the same soname is compatible, at
least one way (= dependency), sometimes both ways (in which case no explicit
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036
--- Comment #13 from Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-12-10 20:05:22 CET ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Does this Require or BuildRequire chromaprint from Fedora? If so, it should
probably be added to the .spec.
Well, it IS chromaprint,
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036
--- Comment #14 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2011-12-10
21:12:40 CET ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #7)
Does this Require or BuildRequire chromaprint from Fedora? If so, it should
probably be added
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036
--- Comment #15 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2011-12-10
21:21:39 CET ---
Also probably don't need the subpackage nomenclature -n chromaprint-tools for
%description and %files because the package is already named
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 16: 2
devede-3.19.0-1.fc16
minitube-1.6-3.fc16
Packages built and
2011/12/10 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
The Fedora 15 update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xine-lib-1.1.20-1.fc15
is now queued for stable too.
This update seem to have been delayed to the next push.
I wonder why ?
Seems everything was appropriate according to the bohdi
2011/12/10 rpmfusion-pkgs-rep...@rpmfusion.org:
...
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 15: 19
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-15-18
...
xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.20-3.fc15
^^ This update
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 15: 9
catalyst-kmod-11.11-1.fc15.1
catalyst-kmod-11.11-1.fc15.2
mame-0.144u2-1.fc15
nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.31-1.fc15.8
15 matches
Mail list logo
