[Bug 2098] Review request: dolphin-emu - Gamecube / Wii / Triforce Emulator

2011-12-19 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2098 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||beleg...@gmail.com

[Bug 2054] Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition

2011-12-19 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054 --- Comment #5 from Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com 2011-12-19 19:23:24 CET --- Ok, I added the cmake option to stop -O3 and also added OpenMP for parallelization instead of TBB since OCE didn't want to build properly on Fedora 15 with the version

Re: OpenCascade license?

2011-12-19 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: yes, I am, taking for review now Ok, now that you've approved it I need your RPM Fusion account name to add as a co-maintainer :) Thanks, Richard

Re: OpenCascade license?

2011-12-19 Thread Dan Horák
Richard Shaw píše v Po 19. 12. 2011 v 12:27 -0600: On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote: yes, I am, taking for review now Ok, now that you've approved it I need your RPM Fusion account name to add as a co-maintainer :) My account is sharkcz. And thanks for the

[Bug 2054] Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition

2011-12-19 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054 Richard hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||33 --- Comment #6 from

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2011-12-19

2011-12-19 Thread rpmfusion-pkgs-report
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/15: 3 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-15-20 guvcview-1.5.1-1.fc15 VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-4.1.2-2.fc15.1

[Bug 2098] Review request: dolphin-emu - Gamecube / Wii / Triforce Emulator

2011-12-19 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2098 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Newton alexjn...@hotmail.com 2011-12-20 02:43:38 CET --- I have a few questions if you're able to answer them: 1) Which requires are considered explicit? All of them? or just the ones that the package needs that