https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #30 from Mattia Meneguzzo
2012-05-15 08:20:56 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> 1. Are you sure this requires Gnome 3.4? I've been running this extension on
> Fedora 16 with Gnome 3.1
I specified that requirement because I know
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/17: 3
staging-kmod-addons-3.3-1.fc17.1
wxsvg-1.1.8-1.fc17
xmms2-freeworld-0.8-2.fc17
==
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/17: 1
gmameui-0.2.12-1.fc17
Packages built and released for RPM Fus
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #29 from Richard 2012-05-14 21:52:14 CEST ---
Quick spec review:
1. Are you sure this requires Gnome 3.4? I've been running this extension on
Fedora 16 with Gnome 3.1.
2. You need one blank line between your changelog entries for b
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
--- Comment #28 from Mattia Meneguzzo
2012-05-14 21:37:49 CEST ---
Until I become an official RPMFusion packager (soon, hopefully), I'll go on
releasing my builds here.
Here's the latest version, which corrects issue
https://github.com/Neroth/g
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2126
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet 2012-05-14 21:06:23
CEST ---
Yes it "can" goes there license wise. So it might be better to have it reviewed
in fedora. But a Legal advice would be welcomed.
Until then, the previous package was already in
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2325
--- Comment #3 from MartinKG 2012-05-14 18:39:59 CEST ---
SRPM URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-mp3/vdr-mp3-0.10.2-12.fc17.src.rpm?a=AaxHNkLENPM
Spec URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-mp3/vdr-
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2126
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
--- Comment #1 from
2012/5/14 Karel Volný :
>
> hi,
>
> sorry for late reply ...
>
>> ufoai (weird issue with the previous package - but there is a
>> 2.4)
>
> I've tried to update to 2.4 but there's quite a lot of changes
> and I hadn't time to cope with it :-(
>
> what is the "weird issue"?
Probably something relat
hi,
sorry for late reply ...
> ufoai (weird issue with the previous package - but there is a
> 2.4)
I've tried to update to 2.4 but there's quite a lot of changes
and I hadn't time to cope with it :-(
what is the "weird issue"?
K.
--
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> paintdotnet
I think it should be orphaned. Paintdotnet source code hasn't been
available for years (circa 2009). Moreover, pinta is already in
Fedora.
Bye,
Andrea.
11 matches
Mail list logo