[Bug 2420] pSX - An emulator which fully emulates the Sony Playstation.

2012-07-20 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420 --- Comment #9 from Jeremy Newton 2012-07-21 02:52:35 CEST --- Looks much better; the only I would note is adding a blank line between changelog entries. Obviously not a breaking issue and doesn't need a rebuild or a new revision. Just for futu

[Bug 2420] pSX - An emulator which fully emulates the Sony Playstation.

2012-07-20 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420 --- Comment #8 from Martyn Hare 2012-07-21 02:12:41 CEST --- Updated URLs: Binary RPM: http://repo.warofthenerd.net/f17/i686/pSX-1.13-2.fc17.i686.rpm Source RPM: http://repo.warofthenerd.net/source/pSX-1.13-2.fc17.src.rpm Spec File: http:/

[Bug 2420] pSX - An emulator which fully emulates the Sony Playstation.

2012-07-20 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420 Martyn Hare changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #933 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 2420] pSX - An emulator which fully emulates the Sony Playstation.

2012-07-20 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420 Martyn Hare changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #931 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request

2012-07-20 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Martyn Hare changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||2420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzill

[Bug 2420] pSX - An emulator which fully emulates the Sony Playstation.

2012-07-20 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420 Martyn Hare changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||30 --- Comment #5 from Martyn Hare 2012-

[Bug 1806] Review request: opera - A fast and secure web browser and Internet suite

2012-07-20 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Chauvet 2012-07-20 18:09:47 CEST --- @Patrick BTW, Can you please upload at least your latest spec file ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving thi

[Bug 1806] Review request: opera - A fast and secure web browser and Internet suite

2012-07-20 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|rpmfusion

Re: Need advice: Migration of mythtv config data

2012-07-20 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > Since my last email to the list, I tracked down the upstream > discussion on this [1], and it looks like upstream is planning on > changing the names of these configuration files anyway. So if we > implement this now, we might end up with two %p

Re: Need advice: Migration of mythtv config data

2012-07-20 Thread Richard Shaw
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > I'm wondering what specific data needs to be moved? I read over > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/2085 , is that the main issue? Was > there a link to an upstream discussion on that? Unfortunately no... There are channel icons, temporary files,

[Bug 1806] Review request: Opera 11.50

2012-07-20 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806 --- Comment #12 from Russell Golden 2012-07-20 16:24:22 CEST --- Awesome! For the time being, I have a Fedora repo and an EL6 repo set up for Opera. All I do is grab Opera's official RPMs and make a repository out of them, but it makes lives e

Re: Need advice: Migration of mythtv config data

2012-07-20 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:49 AM, David Timms wrote: > > Tend to agree, except, the subtle push in the right direction eg better > matching the FHS, and patches that make it, and config relocations of the > config that could help lead upstream into a better config solution. Once > they see it worki

Re: Need advice: Migration of mythtv config data

2012-07-20 Thread David Timms
On 07/20/2012 08:38 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: My gut reaction is that this is still a bug to be fixed upstream, and we shouldn't diverge RPM Fusion too much if possible, but I'm open to discussion. Tend to agree, except, the subtle push in the right direction eg better matching the FHS, and patche