https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420
--- Comment #9 from Jeremy Newton 2012-07-21 02:52:35
CEST ---
Looks much better; the only I would note is adding a blank line between
changelog entries. Obviously not a breaking issue and doesn't need a rebuild or
a new revision. Just for futu
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420
--- Comment #8 from Martyn Hare 2012-07-21 02:12:41
CEST ---
Updated URLs:
Binary RPM: http://repo.warofthenerd.net/f17/i686/pSX-1.13-2.fc17.i686.rpm
Source RPM: http://repo.warofthenerd.net/source/pSX-1.13-2.fc17.src.rpm
Spec File: http:/
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420
Martyn Hare changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #933 is|0 |1
obsolete|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420
Martyn Hare changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #931 is|0 |1
obsolete|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
Martyn Hare changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||2420
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2420
Martyn Hare changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||30
--- Comment #5 from Martyn Hare 2012-
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806
--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Chauvet 2012-07-20 18:09:47
CEST ---
@Patrick
BTW, Can you please upload at least your latest spec file ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|rpmfusion
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Since my last email to the list, I tracked down the upstream
> discussion on this [1], and it looks like upstream is planning on
> changing the names of these configuration files anyway. So if we
> implement this now, we might end up with two %p
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> I'm wondering what specific data needs to be moved? I read over
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/2085 , is that the main issue? Was
> there a link to an upstream discussion on that?
Unfortunately no... There are channel icons, temporary files,
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1806
--- Comment #12 from Russell Golden 2012-07-20
16:24:22 CEST ---
Awesome!
For the time being, I have a Fedora repo and an EL6 repo set up for Opera. All
I do is grab Opera's official RPMs and make a repository out of them, but it
makes lives e
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:49 AM, David Timms wrote:
>
> Tend to agree, except, the subtle push in the right direction eg better
> matching the FHS, and patches that make it, and config relocations of the
> config that could help lead upstream into a better config solution. Once
> they see it worki
On 07/20/2012 08:38 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
My gut reaction is that this is still a bug to be fixed upstream, and
we shouldn't diverge RPM Fusion too much if possible, but I'm open to
discussion.
Tend to agree, except, the subtle push in the right direction eg better
matching the FHS, and patche
13 matches
Mail list logo