https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2532
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|33 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2473
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|33 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2472
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|33 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1798
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|33 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
--- Comment #36 from Nicolas Chauvet 2012-11-06 22:03:17
CET ---
(In reply to comment #0)
...
> This package is not eligible for Fedora because, while it is free itself, it
> is
> used to install numerous non-free software packages. Typically
Hi Martin,
this is a manual operation. You are not alone in waiting for your
request. You just need to be patient :-)
Bye,
Andrea.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Package CVS request for
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2532[https://3c.w
Hi,
The Package CVS request for
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2532[https://3c.web.de/mail/client/dereferrer?redirectUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.rpmfusion.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D2532&selection=tfol11b1fac6f28b288e]
is not yet approved.
Is there any reason ?
Thanks
Martin
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:25 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Im considering to package the Spotify client [1]: This is a binary
> without sources aimed for the nonfree section. Two issues are not
> immediately clear to me:
>
> -Package has a frightening attachment of included licenses [2]. Do I
Im considering to package the Spotify client [1]: This is a binary
without sources aimed for the nonfree section. Two issues are not
immediately clear to me:
-Package has a frightening attachment of included licenses [2]. Do I
need to sort out all of these in the License: tag?! Or is the
