https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043
Simone Caronni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #21 from Simone Caronni
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3034
Simone Caronni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #25 from Simone Caronni
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
Simone Caronni changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||negativ...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
Andrea Musuruane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
Block
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3034
--- Comment #26 from Simone Caronni 2014-01-29 09:43:31
CET ---
Sorry, I used the Fedora branch name. Updated request:
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: lpf-skype
New Branches: EL-6
Updated EPEL Owners: leamas slaanes
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043
--- Comment #22 from Simone Caronni 2014-01-29 09:44:11
CET ---
Sorry, I used the Fedora branch name. Updated request:
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: lpf-flash-plugin
New Branches: EL-6
Updated RPMFusion Owners: le
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
--- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2014-01-29 09:55:52
CET ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I'm going to close this bug as WONTFIX, but if anyone wants to step up and
> > maintain gstreamer* packages for EL6, they are
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
--- Comment #5 from Simone Caronni 2014-01-29 10:45:37
CET ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > Can I proceed in asking permissions on the original Review Requests?
>
> Yes feel free to do so.
I can't find the original reviews for -ugly and -ffmp
On 1/29/14, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
>
> --- Comment #38 from Sérgio Basto 2014-01-29 08:56:22
> CET ---
> (In reply to comment #30)
>>
> Less legal/policy concerns but will give more work to develop.
Not necessarily. See spot's comment in
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/20: 7
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-20-6
libvdpau-va-gl-0.3.2-1.fc20
ndiswrapper-kmod-1.59-5.fc20.5
openafs-kmod-1.6.6-0.pre1.fc20.9
stagi
Formally, this is about review request 3152 for dropbox-repo [1]. From
a more practical POV, it's about users being able to install software
like dropbox more or less "out of the box", an area where I think we
really need to improve (as can be seen in all those "Fedora XX post
installation guide" o
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Formally, this is about review request 3152 for dropbox-repo [1]. From
> a more practical POV, it's about users being able to install software
> like dropbox more or less "out of the box", an area where I think we
> really need to improve (as
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/20: 5
lpf-flash-plugin-11.2.202.335-1.fc20
nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.38-4.fc20.5
nvidia-304xx-kmod-304.119-1.fc20.1
nvidia-kmod-331.38-
>On 1/29/14, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Alec Leamas
>> wrote:
> At the start of RPM Fusion we had a sort of steering committee which
> handled such decisions (IIRC Hans, Matthias and Thorsten). Each of them
> represented one of the repositories merged in RPM Fusi
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3110
--- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede 2014-01-29 13:53:07
CET ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > > Can I proceed in asking permissions on the original Review Requests?
> >
> > Yes feel free to do so.
>
> I can't find the
Update from the CMPlayer developer [1]:
>I can't be sure till I see the actual result. However, because they
have very nice attitude to accept suggestions, if somethings are lacked
in the result, I think I can make acceptable patch that point once it is
released.
So it doesn't seem like anyt
On Qua, 2014-01-29 at 11:22 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 1/29/14, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
> >
> > --- Comment #38 from Sérgio Basto 2014-01-29 08:56:22
> > CET ---
> > (In reply to comment #30)
> >>
> > Less legal/policy concerns but w
Sorry, above all, what means "GL" ?
Guideline(s)
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
Guide Lines...
--a
On 1/29/14, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2014-01-29 at 11:22 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> On 1/29/14, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
>> > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152
>> >
>> > --- Comment #38 from Sérgio Basto 2014-01-29
>> > 08:56:22
>> > CET ---
>> > (
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043
--- Comment #23 from Sérgio Basto 2014-01-29 19:42:53 CET
---
flash-plugin: install completed, no errors
flash-plugin is now updated
thanks
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are recei
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043
--- Comment #24 from Sérgio Basto 2014-01-29 19:45:44 CET
---
(In reply to comment #23)
> flash-plugin: install completed, no errors
>
> flash-plugin is now updated
>
> thanks
sorry. reported in wrong bug report, but cvs request can be made
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
--- Comment #2 from Matias Kreder 2014-01-29 20:17:46 CET
---
Thank you. I have contacted the requester of one of the previous BZs to see if
he is still interested in packaging it. If so, I will help him with the review.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
--- Comment #3 from Matias Kreder 2014-01-29 20:22:27 CET
---
The requester of #2577 replied saying he is no longer interested in packaging
it. #1539 is almost dead.
I think we should go ahead using this BZ.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
Would it be possible to start building against RHEL 7 beta?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwr
Hello,
I just wanted to know since work on epel has started a while ago for the
EL7 repo do you think you will make a repo for the EL 7 beta in the
meantime or once epel is done ?
Thank you
Claudio
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
--- Comment #11 from Stuart Gathman 2014-01-29 23:14:28
CET ---
I submitted this package quite some time ago. Did I miss something? Was there
a next step I was supposed to take? I don't believe I have priv to build on
the official build syst
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Richard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Ric
27 matches
Mail list logo
