On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't
> updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. If
> someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next week.
>
I
On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet
> wrote:
> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they
> wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++
> ABI
I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others.
There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't
updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. If
someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next week.
Also few packages and libraries
Le mercredi 4 novembre 2015, 13:01:51 Hans de Goede a écrit :
> > So for now I'll just use/suggest the innoextract package provided by
> > upstream.
>
> I do not think this is a good idea, we really want to do this properly.
Ok I'll start with this one, because:
- it's the most usefull utility
On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 12:07 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others.
>
>
>
> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't
> updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes.
> If someone can bring me a list
On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet
> > wrote:
> > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they
> > wasn't updated
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539
Göran Uddeborg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
Depends