On Sex, 2016-01-15 at 13:40 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Since everything is manual I don't know how difficult this would be
> but I would like to build OpenShot 2.0 so that those who want to try
> it out can but it's still officially considered beta.
>
> Thoughts?
Go for it, build it for F23 ,
Since everything is manual I don't know how difficult this would be but I
would like to build OpenShot 2.0 so that those who want to try it out can
but it's still officially considered beta.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Richard
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #55 from Antonio Trande 2016-01-15 20:37:16
CET ---
Created attachment 1546
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1546
Proposed patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #54 from Antonio Trande 2016-01-15 20:36:15
CET ---
Created attachment 1545
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1545
Proposed spec file
(In reply to comment #52)
>
> - AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found
> AC_PROG_L
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3912
--- Comment #42 from Antonio Trande 2016-01-15 17:40:17
CET ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> OK, added appdata in the root directory:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/lives/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/LiVES.appdata.xml
>
> When I come to do the next releas
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3912
--- Comment #41 from salsaman 2016-01-15 17:31:58 CET ---
OK, added appdata in the root directory:
https://sourceforge.net/p/lives/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/LiVES.appdata.xml
When I come to do the next release I'll check if I have any suitable
scree
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #53 from Antonio Trande 2016-01-15 14:48:47
CET ---
Created attachment 1544
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1544
review.txt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
--- Comment #52 from Antonio Trande 2016-01-15 14:47:56
CET ---
Review file is very long, I'm leaving it as attached.
Issues:
===
- Please, use V=1 option with 'make'
- Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Note: Using both