https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
--- Comment #9 from Vascom 2016-08-13 07:51:13 CEST ---
SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RussianFedora/ffmulticonverter/master/ffmulticonverter.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
--- Comment #8 from leigh scott 2016-08-12 22:53:37
CEST ---
Review failed
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
1)
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-review@rp
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4152
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4128
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
--- Comment #7 from Vascom 2016-08-12 19:06:48 CEST ---
SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RussianFedora/ffmulticonverter/master/ffmulticonverter.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4128
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
--- Comment #6 from leigh scott 2016-08-12 18:45:57
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Why I must remove gz from man?
Because fedora packaging guidelines state it.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane 2016-08-12 18:44:45
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Why I must remove gz from man?
From:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Manpages
"When
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
--- Comment #4 from Vascom 2016-08-12 18:42:50 CEST ---
Why I must remove gz from man?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4128
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
--- Comment #3 from leigh scott 2016-08-12 18:20:42
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> If you use the correct marco's you should get the error
>
> see
>
>
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
--- Comment #2 from leigh scott 2016-08-12 18:19:46
CEST ---
The shebang errors need fixing
Checking: ffmulticonverter-1.8.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
ffmulticonverter-1.8.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
ffmulticonverter.noarch:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|4182|
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|30 |
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||4182
--
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||30
--
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4128
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande 2016-08-12 17:40:23
CEST ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues
==
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Sex, 2016-08-12 at 08:53 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've published the development/25 tree, mirror manager should point
> to
> the appropriate repos soon.
> Please verify to have the matching rpmfusion-*-release package
> matching your fedora version.
>
> Thx everyone for the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4128
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Comment #43 from Sérgio Basto 2016-08-12 16:13:43 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #42)
> please go a head what is described in Section 3.5 on
> http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Your_package_gets_approved
MartinKG you
On Sex, 2016-08-12 at 11:13 +, Vascom wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> My name is Vasiliy N. Glazov
> My nickname Vascom or vascom
>
> City, Country: Moscow, Russian Federation.
> Profession status: Engeneer.
> Company: Javad GNSS.
>
> I want be maintaner of packages for rpmfusion and I need a
Neal Gompa wrote:
> You really only need to recompile libmedia.so, which is where the
> codec whitelist exists. Both this and the libffmpeg.so library are
> provided by the chromium-libs-media package. I'm not sure if it would
> work with the system ffmpeg library without a patch, so you may need
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4182
Bug #: 4182
Summary: ffmulticonverter - GUI File Format Converter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Greetings,
My name is Vasiliy N. Glazov
My nickname Vascom or vascom
City, Country: Moscow, Russian Federation.
Profession status: Engeneer.
Company: Javad GNSS.
I want be maintaner of packages for rpmfusion and I need a sponsor.
You can read more here
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Comment #42 from MartinKG 2016-08-12 11:39:35 CEST ---
please go a head what is described in Section 3.5 on
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Your_package_gets_approved
--
Configure bugmail:
Hello,
I've published the development/25 tree, mirror manager should point to
the appropriate repos soon.
Please verify to have the matching rpmfusion-*-release package
matching your fedora version.
Thx everyone for the work done.
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
--- Comment #41 from Momcilo Medic 2016-08-12
08:22:59 CEST ---
Hi Martin,
I've done as you told me.
Regards.
%changelog
* Fri Aug 12 2016 Leigh Scott - 0.15.4-1
- Fix release
29 matches
Mail list logo