On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/03/2016 01:50 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>
>> Dear RPMFusion contributors!
>>
>> In light of https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/61 and
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Third_party_software_proposal
>> s
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/03/2016 01:50 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>> Dear RPMFusion contributors!
>>
>> In light of https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/61 and
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Third_party_software_proposal
>> should we start adding Supplements:
On 09/03/2016 01:50 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Dear RPMFusion contributors!
In light of https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/61 and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Third_party_software_proposal
should we start adding Supplements: or Enhances: weak dependencies
to, sa
Dear RPMFusion contributors!
In light of https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/61 and
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Third_party_software_proposal
should we start adding Supplements: or Enhances: weak dependencies
to, say, ffmpeg and other packages?
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http
On Thursday, 01 September 2016 at 19:21, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/31/2016 07:11 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Orion Poplawski, I'd like have an agreement on how put ffmpeg in epel7.
> > What you say ? may we have one ffmpeg ? , should we have multi ffmpegs
> > ? etc.
>
> So would I. But I see
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4009
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
