On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 21:37 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 07:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > the mailing list".
> >
> > I hope have one decision, quickly and close this subject (update
> > ffmpeg
> > in F24 to 3.1.x ? ).
> This is not ideal. The ffmpeg 3.0.x branch is not g
On 10/11/2016 07:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
the mailing list".
I hope have one decision, quickly and close this subject (update ffmpeg
in F24 to 3.1.x ? ).
This is not ideal. The ffmpeg 3.0.x branch is not going unmaintained AFAIK. We can't
push out a big rebuild of a major library so one, ne
Hi,
Nicolas, ask me to bring this discussion to the mailing list .
Nicolas sorry for the delay , I had a big cold, I'm ok now (it just an
excuse :) )
OK, all story is in
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260
and in https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4145
and we have
Hi, Christopher
looking at koji logs [1] , seems to me that you haven't upload the
sources ... , i.e. , you need do something like:
rfpkg new-sources fdkaac-0.6.3.tar.gz
git commit .
git push
and just after that
rfpkg build
Thank you ,
[1]
DEBUG util.py:495: Executing command: ['rfpkg-m
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4224
--- Comment #18 from Cyril Richard ---
@Nicolas
You probably right. we will think about the fact to use dlopen in next release.
Maybe it could be the easiest thing to do.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
