https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler ---
(Sorry for yet another post, but I forgot something important:)
Just a note of warning: If you want to try out qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld, you
will have to close any running QupZilla instances (from before y
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler ---
As explained on IRC, I tried not only https://www.youtube.com/html5 , but also
an actual H.264-only video (from Twitter) that I was unable to watch with
QupZilla before and that worked, too.
(I had to test o
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler ---
> runtime not tested (qt-5.7.1 available only for rawhide a the moment)
I did that now:
http://i.imgur.com/BC7HzMC.png
:-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368
--- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler ---
I filled in the pkgdb form now, but that offers neither f24 nor f23 branches.
OK, f23 is almost dead and Fedora does not allow new packages to be branched
for f23, but why is f24 not offered?
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #4)
> setting fedora-review flag to X (not sure what that means, there doesn't
> seem to be a + setting that matches fedora's workflow)
Thx for report.
Fixed that, so r
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler ---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter ---
setti
I have heard on darktable mailing list and on #radeon on Freenode, that
AMD will release its OpenCL stack into AMDGPU open drivers, so IMHO at
this point there is no reason to package AMDGPU-Pro.
Have a nice day and thank you
___
rpmfusion-developers mail
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler ---
> APPROVED
Thanks! That was quick.
Can you please set the fedora-review+ flag?
> 1. MUST use verifiable sources, can you account for this difference? (maybe
> used a different snapshot?)
Looks like Qt u
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4368
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |4
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter ---
nami
This is a test
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
