> If there is software in RPMFusion that is eligible to be in Fedora,
> it no longer conforms to our guidelines and should be removed, imo.
I wont be doing anything for this as I see it as a fedora task, we have too
little manpower to waste on shit like this!
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 2:03 PM Xavier Bachelot wrote:
A couple of observation regarding lack of viability
for some packages being moved to Fedora (I
have not actually looked at the code bases to
know if there are any more subtle issues involved).
> Here's an hopefully more accurate list:
>
* Leigh Scott [13/04/2019 05:56] :
>
> Why should this change cause us any more work?
If there is software in RPMFusion that is eligible to be in Fedora,
it no longer conforms to our guidelines and should be removed, imo.
If packages end up being created in Fedora, it would be nice if they had
On 13/04/2019 12:56, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Xavier Bachelot wrote:
>> A trimmed naive dnf search brought me this :
>
> Looks like only the packages showing up with .src in your list are actually
> from RPM Fusion, the .x86_64 and i686 ones are actually already in Fedora.
>
> Kevin Kofler
Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> A trimmed naive dnf search brought me this :
Looks like only the packages showing up with .src in your list are actually
from RPM Fusion, the .x86_64 and i686 ones are actually already in Fedora.
Kevin Kofler
___
