--- Begin Message ---
Hello, Leigh Scott.
Sun, 28 Apr 2019 06:33:42 - you wrote:
> If ffmpeg is mutilated for fedora I will consider leaving rpmfusion as I
> don't need the extra workload this will generate!
+1. FFmpeg without patented codecs support will be unusable trash.
--
Sincerely,
On 4/28/19 4:23 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
+1. FFmpeg without patented codecs support will be unusable trash.
It's also unfortunate that the discussion regarding all of this is being done on
Twitter.
___
rpmfusion-developers
On Saturday, 27 April 2019 at 16:58, David Timms wrote:
> On 21/4/19 11:47 pm, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:38 AM Sérgio Basto >
> > On sáb, 2019-04-13 at 16:03 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> > > On 13/04/2019 12:56, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >
> > > dvbc
On Sunday, 28 April 2019 at 16:23, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 4/28/19 4:23 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > +1. FFmpeg without patented codecs support will be unusable trash.
>
> It's also unfortunate that the discussion regarding all of this is being
> done on Twitter.
* Michael Cronenworth [28/04/2019 09:23] :
>
> It's also unfortunate that the discussion regarding all of this is being
> done on Twitter.
Thank you for that tidbit of information; I was starting to wonder
how I couldn't understand what this discussion is about.
Emmanuel
_
On 4/28/19 3:39 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Could you point to the discussion?
https://twitter.com/cfkschaller/status/1121061262107054080
The only way I knew about this is from a Phoronix post. I don't have a Twitter
account nor do I want one.
There are plenty of official chan
David Timms wrote:
> It sounds like Fedora doesn't isn't happy with doing an mp3/mpeg2 only
> ffmpeg (which is all dvbcut needs).. but last I saw still to be decided
> (I hope they go with cutting the non-happy parts and enabling the code
> to dlopen parts which could be built elsewhere).
The latt
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 4/28/19 3:39 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>> Could you point to the discussion?
>
> https://twitter.com/cfkschaller/status/1121061262107054080
>
> The only way I knew about this is from a Phoronix post. I don't have a
> Twitter account nor do I want o
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5236
--- Comment #14 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
I am please to approve license without any feedback from Mega. Because license
allow in Section 2.2:
"You may provide the code to anyone else and publish excerpts of it for the
purposes of review and comm
--- Begin Message ---
Hello, Kevin Kofler.
Mon, 29 Apr 2019 02:06:46 +0200 you wrote:
> What MIGHT work is to ship an ffmpeg-freeworld replacement library using
> ld.so.conf.d tricks the same way qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld works
It will not work. Lots of applications check available codecs suppo
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5236
--- Comment #15 from leigh scott ---
(In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #14)
> I am please to approve license without any feedback from Mega. Because
> license allow in Section 2.2:
>
> "You may provide the code to anyone else and publish
11 matches
Mail list logo
