https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #18 from Akarshan Biswas ---
(In reply to qvint from comment #17)
> Updated to 77.0.3865.90.
>
> - spec:
> https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2019-09-25_1/
> chromium-browser-privacy.spec
> - src.rpm:
> https:/
On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 15:13 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> With rfpkg 1.26.1 commit [1], rfpkg build should call target
> multilibs
> by default for packages [2], please test it . (I'm already testing
> it)
> You may test scratch builds for F30 and F29 [3] .
>
> Feedback is welcome .
>
> [1]
> h
With rfpkg 1.26.1 commit [1], rfpkg build should call target multilibs
by default for packages [2], please test it . (I'm already testing it)
You may test scratch builds for F30 and F29 [3] .
Feedback is welcome .
[1]
https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rfpkg/commit/d94ede33e0cf55fbab9205a5c06
RPM Fusion update report
Section free:
-
Fedora 29
-
Pushed to testing:
mock-rpmfusion-free-31.1-1.fc29
mock-rpmfusion-free-31.1-2.fc29
Pushed to stable:
obs-studio-24.0.1-1.fc29
qtox-1.16.3-1.20190922gitaf02542.fc29
rfpkg-minimal-0.4.1-3.fc29
F
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5114
--- Comment #17 from qvint ---
Updated to 77.0.3865.90.
- spec:
https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2019-09-25_1/chromium-browser-privacy.spec
- src.rpm:
https://ungoogled.blob.core.windows.net/ungoogled/review/2019-09-25_1
Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 10:14, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
>
> Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > For information, RHEL8 is obviously building i686 with -m32
> > -march=x86_64 by default, so I assume the i686 packages are already
> > built using a x86_64 userspace there.
>
> -m32 has always been in the RPM %{_
Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> For information, RHEL8 is obviously building i686 with -m32
> -march=x86_64 by default, so I assume the i686 packages are already
> built using a x86_64 userspace there.
-m32 has always been in the RPM %{_optflags} for 32-bit. This does not mean
the RPMs are actually buil
