[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #110 from Nerijus Baliūnas --- What is a problem with -Conflicts: %{srcname}-va-drivers >= %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{version}-%{release} +Conflicts: %{srcname}-va-drivers%{?_isa} >= %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{versi

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #109 from Gary Buhrmaster --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #103) > I don't think there is any reliable solution I would imagine that the only (semi) reliable solution is to inform people to d

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #108 from Kevin Kofler --- I guess the %{?_isa} also fixes the self-conflict because the virtual Provides does not have a version with %{?_isa} (you would have to add that explicitly, but you probably don't beca

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #107 from Nerijus Baliūnas --- Totally forgot about mock, thanks! The packages installed successfully, with Removing dependent packages: mesa-va-drivers both i686 and x86_64. -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #106 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Nerijus Baliūnas from comment #105) > That's exactly what I suggested. I built x86_64 package with %{?_isa} added > to Conflicts, but building i686 package on 64 bit OS

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #105 from Nerijus Baliūnas --- That's exactly what I suggested. I built x86_64 package with %{?_isa} added to Conflicts, but building i686 package on 64 bit OS fails: FAILED: src/mapi/glapi/libglapi_bridge.a.p/.

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #104 from Nicolas Chauvet --- Technically this might fix it: -Conflicts: %{srcname}-va-drivers >= %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{version}-%{release} +Conflicts: %{srcname}-va-drivers%{?_isa} >= %{?epoch:%{epoch}:

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #103 from Nicolas Chauvet --- (In reply to Nerijus Baliūnas from comment #101) > Would it work if instead of conflicts "mesa-va-drivers >= 22.3.3-1.fc37" No, see https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #102 from Nerijus Baliūnas --- Looking at "provides" it should probably be: mesa-va-drivers(x86-32) >= 22.3.3-1.fc37 and mesa-va-drivers(x86-64) >= 22.3.3-1.fc37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #101 from Nerijus Baliūnas --- Would it work if instead of conflicts "mesa-va-drivers >= 22.3.3-1.fc37" each package would have: mesa-va-drivers >= 22.3.3-1.fc37.i686 mesa-va-drivers >= 22.3.3-1.fc37.x86_64 ? -

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #100 from Nerijus Baliūnas --- Same problem as before, conflict between i686 and x86_64: Problema: package mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-22.3.3-1.fc37.i686 conflicts with mesa-va-drivers >= 22.3.3-1.fc37 provided b

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #99 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- (In reply to Kamil Páral from comment #98) > Luya, any chance to fix the issues mentioned above? There's > mesa-22.3.3-1.fc37 currently in updates-testing, it will need a matching

[Bug 6426] Review request: mesa-freeworld - Mesa graphics libraries

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6426 --- Comment #98 from Kamil Páral --- Luya, any chance to fix the issues mentioned above? There's mesa-22.3.3-1.fc37 currently in updates-testing, it will need a matching freeworld update very soon. -- You are receiving th

[Bug 6529] Review request: v4l2-relay- Utils for relaying Gstreamer source to any other Gstreamer source.

2023-01-12 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6529 --- Comment #6 from Kate Hsuan --- Hi Folks, SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/smallorange/v4l2-relay/main/v4l2-relayd.spec SRPM: https://github.com/smallorange/v4l2-relay/releases/download/0.1.2-2/v4l2-relayd-0.1.2-