Re: [audacity-freeworld] Update to Audacity 2.3.3 - how to use appstream / override in mock

On 26/12/19 4:21 pm, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sun, 2019-12-01 at 21:46 +1100, David Timms wrote: How to enable override repo in a local mock build ? I should work now with new mock-rpmfusion-free-31.2-1 [1] , thanks to Xavier [1] mock blabla --enablerepo=buildsys-override-free Cheers

Re: [audacity-freeworld] Update to Audacity 2.3.3 - how to use appstream / override in mock

On 29/11/19 9:29 pm, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Le ven. 29 nov. 2019 à 11:14, David Timms a écrit : commit 8eb6c033f30f616867f13afc21d90076e9bc9374 Author: David Timms Date: Fri Nov 29 21:11:52 2019 +1100 ... Name: audacity-freeworld -Version: 2.3.2 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version

Re: [audacity-freeworld] Update to Audacity 2.3.3. Modify wxWidgets build require to wxGTK3 (gtk3 version). Modify libdir pat

On 29/11/19 9:29 pm, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Le ven. 29 nov. 2019 à 11:14, David Timms a écrit : commit 8eb6c033f30f616867f13afc21d90076e9bc9374 Author: David Timms Date: Fri Nov 29 21:11:52 2019 +1100 Update to Audacity 2.3.3. Modify wxWidgets build require to wxGTK3 (gtk3

rfpkg trouble: "ImportError: No module named builtins"

Hi, I haven't used rfpkg for maybe 6 months. Have been using fedpkg with success. I'm trying a number of commands with f29 rfpkg: === rfpkg clone free/audacity-freeworld Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/rfpkg", line 11, in load_entry_point('rfpkg==1.26.2', 'console_scrip

Re: Package: audacity-freeworld-2.3.2-1.fc30 Tag: f30-free-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: leigh123linux

Hi Leigh, looks like 4th try lucky :-) I'm about to make same change for fc29, in case there is something I need to change in the package. What trick was required to get the build to be able to download ssh-client and build etc ? Cheers, David Timms On 19/6/19 9:54 pm, RPM Fusion

Re: Fwd: [Fedora-legal-list] MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Video

On 21/4/19 11:47 pm, Richard Shaw wrote: On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:38 AM Sérgio Basto On sáb, 2019-04-13 at 16:03 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > On 13/04/2019 12:56, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > dvbcut: Clip and convert DVB transport streams to MPEG2 programDVBCut actually has

Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?

On 05/10/18 07:20, David Timms wrote: On 04/10/18 14:37, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: .. Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? x264 soname bump I wanted to Audacity 2.3.0 built and ready for the release, since their

Re: Anything missing for RPM Fusion readiness for f29 ?

On 04/10/18 14:37, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 12:47 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: .. Anyone has still task planned for RPM Fusion f29 GA ? x264 soname bump I wanted to Audacity 2.3.0 built and ready for the release, since their release was done last month. I had build fail

Re: [dvbcut/f28] (2 commits) ...- Rebuilt for new ffmpeg snapshot

On 09/03/18 02:30, Leigh Scott wrote: > Summary of changes: > > 239f3c2... - Rebuilt for new ffmpeg snapshot (*) > 132323f... - Rebuilt for new ffmpeg snapshot (*) > Thanks again, Leigh, for knowing enough about ffmpeg to make these patches, and for doing them in my absence. Cheers, David.

Re: About the update audacity in RPM Fusion

On 25/03/17 23:00, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > If you update audacity in fedora, don't forget to update the freeworld > version along. > In the case there is no more interest in the -freeworld version, > please use rfpkg retire on the rpmfusion version and add the proper > obsoletes/provides in the fe

Re: packager ssl issue with rf git push/new-sources/upload

On 15/11/16 06:18, Stuart Gathman wrote: > On 11/14/2016 07:18 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2016-11-14 12:47 GMT+01:00 David Timms : >>> Hi, I'm trying to do the above actions with rfpkg and getting error: >>> $ rfpkg upload ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/audacity-zz.tar.gz &

packager ssl issue with rf git push/new-sources/upload

Hi, I'm trying to do the above actions with rfpkg and getting error: $ rfpkg upload ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/audacity-zz.tar.gz Could not execute new_sources: (58, 'SSL peer rejected your certificate as expired.') Tried: 1. Re-uploaded my ID with: Public RSA SSH Key https://admin.rpmfusion.org/accounts/

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness - provenpackagers list ?

On 07/11/15 22:07, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Best would be to make a general review of missing updates. Audacity-freeworld is mine. The most recent release 2.1.1 is in f22 updates, but it appears only 2.0.6 is in F23 -free. I've bee building git alpha audacity on Fedora COPR, but it's still some t

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released - kmediafactory patches

On 23/10/14 09:15, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2014-10-22 14:26 GMT+02:00 David Timms <mailto:dti...@iinet.net.au>>: > > On 22/10/14 23:23, David Timms wrote: > > No testing of the binary package at all, but I think the changes seem > > good. I don't

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released - kmediafactory patches

On 22/10/14 23:23, David Timms wrote: > No testing of the binary package at all, but I think the changes seem > good. I don't have commit access so someone else will need sort that > side out, see attached. > > If no super-packager can commit, then I can make a bug to hold the

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released - kmediafactory patches

top %{_datadir}/mime/packages/kmediafactory.xml %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig %files libs -f libkmf.lang %{_kde4_libdir}/libkmediafactoryinterfaces.so.0* %{_kde4_libdir}/libkmediafactorykstore.so.0* %{_kde4_libdir}/libkmf.so.0* %files devel %{_kde4_includedir}/kmediafactory/ %{_

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

On 15/10/14 16:42, Julian Sikorski wrote: ... > I don't think anything has changed since last time: dvbcut and > kmediafactory fail to rebuild, vlc needs a patch, everything else builds > fine. David Timms was working on making dvbcut work, but I have not > heard from him regardi

Re: How to test build for F21+rpmfusion devel ?

On 04/10/14 23:57, David Timms wrote: > On 02/10/14 22:52, David Timms wrote: >> On 02/10/14 15:36, Julian Sikorski wrote: > .. >>>> Which packages are remaining please ? >>>> >>> dvbcut and kmediafactory. ... > I did a mock test build with: > moc

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

On 02/10/14 22:52, David Timms wrote: > On 02/10/14 15:36, Julian Sikorski wrote: .. >>> Which packages are remaining please ? >>> >> dvbcut and kmediafactory. > I should have time this weekend to look at my dvbcut package. > Any hints welcome... > Dave. I

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

On 02/10/14 15:36, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 01.10.2014 o 23:03, David Timms pisze: >> On 02/10/14 03:51, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> ... >>> Looks like we are almost there. The two remaining packages have not been >>> touched by upstream in ages and maybe w

Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

On 02/10/14 03:51, Julian Sikorski wrote: ... > Looks like we are almost there. The two remaining packages have not been > touched by upstream in ages and maybe we should reconsider whether it is > worth carrying them. Which packages are remaining please ?

Re: Appstream data for rpmfusion

On 10/21/2013 11:42 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 11:49 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote: ... >> http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2013/10/16/how-to-generate-appstream-metadata-for-fedora/ >> >> Would rpmfusion be able to provide appstream data? My understanding is that we can best play a pa

Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit)

On 18/09/13 10:48, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 05:34 +1000, David Timms wrote: >> How about using a released version aka fedora 19 ? > > Excuse me? Is installing an alpha release to help with testing a > bad thing nowadays? No, definitely not, but you need to de

Re: MPD update (Was: Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit))

On 18/09/13 17:35, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 15:32 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote: It'll need a > review though. Should I file a bug and add these as attachments? Check for an existing 'upgrade the package/broken dependency/ffmpeg /fail to build from source etc' bug first, and if it do

Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit)

On 18/09/13 03:29, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> Can I do anything to help fix this? I'd like my mpd server running ;) How about using a released version aka fedora 19 ?

ffmpeg-2 help request for dvbcut and best practices...

Hi, my package dvbcut relies on ffmpeg, and has hence needed a fairly solid hand to get compiling under ffmpeg-2. While it now builds locally and in the buildsys OK, my incomplete patches cause failures during the application runtime. This package provides multiple export capabilites; 2 via the au

Re: Uploading of plague results and logs to buildsys failing ?

On 02/09/13 05:15, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sáb, 2013-08-31 at 12:05 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> On Sáb, 2013-08-31 at 11:44 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It seems that the uploading of plague results and logs to >>> buildsys.rpmfusion.org is not working properly, >>> ie this is

Re: add_to_repo? - builder issue

On 03/09/13 01:00, Richard Shaw wrote: > I haven't seen this one before: > > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=18286 Yeah, mine (18287) is failing also in the prep build requires stage: Seems it can't get a correct copy of binutils and Perl something. The top level link [1]

Re: Late branching for F-20 because of FFmpeg deps needfix

On 27/08/13 19:31, Hans de Goede wrote: ... > If you want me to help with other packages, a list of packages needing > work would be useful. I might need help later, but am slowly working through compile issues with dvbcut, so leave this for now. David.

Re: mass rebuild for x264/ffmpeg/mplayer on F19 - dvbcut

On 29/05/13 03:57, Julian Sikorski wrote: ... > It's probably too late now, but here are my 2 cents: > - packages having mplayer in dependencies (like gmtk) do not need to be > rebuilt at all - they don't link to mplayer, they just use the executable > - this is what I use to get the deps whenever

Re: cvs update - ssh key problem ?

On 14/05/13 19:11, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2013/5/14 David Timms mailto:dti...@iinet.net.au>> > > I'm sure my linux foo is somewhat depleted... what's going on here: > > [davidt@davidtdesktop cvs-free]$ cvs update > Agent admitted failure to si

cvs update - ssh key problem ?

I'm sure my linux foo is somewhat depleted... what's going on here: [davidt@davidtdesktop cvs-free]$ cvs update Agent admitted failure to sign using the key. Permission denied (publickey). cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) Thought the fas generated cert

Re: ffmpeg-0.11 in F-17

On 08/18/2012 06:24 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/8/18 Julian Sikorski : where do we stand on ffmpeg-0.11.x rebuild? I it good enough to warrant pushing to F-17? Nope, ABI breaking packages are not expected in stable release. I'm not even sure every package was rebuilt with the new ffmpeg

Re: Need advice: Migration of mythtv config data

On 07/20/2012 08:38 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: My gut reaction is that this is still a bug to be fixed upstream, and we shouldn't diverge RPM Fusion too much if possible, but I'm open to discussion. Tend to agree, except, the subtle push in the right direction eg better matching the FHS, and patche

Re: FFmpeg-0.11.1 and x264-0.124 on rawhide

On 12/07/12 07:51, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/6/28 Sérgio Basto : I see that many packages fails to rebuild with new FFmpeg-0.11.1 and x264-0.124 on rawhide ... dvbcut ... Ok, so since there a pending ABI change in fedora for the underlying package dependencies (libudev>systemd) I will kic

Re: Undo "make build'

On 17/06/12 04:27, Alec Leamas wrote: I have some bujilds which, although successful, really shouldn't be propagated to the F-16 repo They are now sitting in wait for signing. What could i do in order to wipe them out completely? Hello, Probably let Nicolas know which packages, I think it has t

Re: Updating mplayer in F-16

On 01/03/12 04:11, Julian Sikorski wrote: If someone wants to test the newest possible snapshots, they are available here: http://lesloueizeh.com/belegdol/ Hi Julian, I grabbed the set of mplayer rpms x86_64 and tried mplayer out with a random selection of mp3, mp4, wma, wmf, asf, avi, mpg (d

Re: To All Package maintainer ! - no F-17 builds at the moment.

On 23/02/12 07:42, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: This stands for all packagers! Can you please update your spec in all branches when relevant ? This worth for devel AND F-17 ! (please update your checkout if not done already). I've done a cvs update in the top-level of my package eg rpms/audacity-free

Re: lame/x264/ffmpeg/vlc silent ABI changes

On 22/02/12 08:25, Julian Sikorski wrote: I tried updating mplayer but it fails on ffmpeg. Would you mind submitting this work so that we can move forward with mplayer? I'd hate to see it vanish. Bug #2188 most likely needs to be fixed before anything can be built though. Other packages that re

Re: Devel builds broken?

On 07/02/12 14:27, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 15:18 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/2/6 Richard Shaw: Can you try to reproduce with a local mock on your machine, if not done already ? It's probably related to the recent UsrMove change and maybe need to clean the mock cache on t

Re: Build that have failed in rawhide - same issue ?

On 04/02/12 06:39, Richard Shaw wrote: Nevermind, I added "export PLAGUE_CLIENT_CONFIG=~/.plague-client-rpmfusion.cfg" and it worked. I guess you need to do it all on one line unless you export the shell variable. OK, tried the export. The command seems to requeue OK: export PLAGUE_CLIENT_CONFI

Re: MythTV for EL-6 discussion

On 05/01/12 08:26, Richard Shaw wrote: Here's my current status, please let me know if there's something I need to update: Missing dependencies for MythTV on EPEL 6. --- lirc [1] (built, pending for testing) libfame [2] (built) mjpegtools [13] (which version to build?) -> libquicktime

Re: libspotify in non-free?

On 04/01/12 22:31, Jonathan Dieter wrote: Does anyone object to putting libspotify into non-free? I've put together a package, but I'm not sure what their redistribution policy is. The main thing in their Terms of Use seems to be that it's for non-commercial use, but I don't think that's a prob

Re: Newcomer - Package Reviews

On 25/10/11 02:30, Nicolas Viéville wrote: I think I must wait to be "approved" before posting my spec file to the CVS? No, you don't need to be in approved state to submit a spec file for review. Once your modification will be approved and the reviewer considers you are capable to maintain a p

Re: replacement builder needed

On 24/10/11 05:02, Richard Shaw wrote: I'm sure there are some technical hurdles but a distributed approach may keep us from having to come up with a dedicated builder. What does everyone think? I wouldn't mind doing so, but I don't think the machine side is that hard from the sound of it. More

Re: FFmpeg 0.8.2 and x264 ABI 116 in devel/F-16

On 04/09/11 17:41, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: We don't have "testing" for devel branch, do we? Anyway, the builds are done. They don't appear in yum --enablerepo=* list ffmpeg (I see: ffmpeg.x86_64 0.7.1-1.fc16 rpmfusion-free-rawhide ) Do we need to wait until it's pushed to rawhide

Re: FFmpeg 0.8.2 and x264 ABI 116 in devel/F-16

On 04/09/11 07:38, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: The plan is to push FFmpeg 0.8.2 and latest x264 stable git to devel/F-16 branch. There are 34 packages which depend on these two. Out of those, only 2 (two!) had build failures which I wasn't able to fix quickly, namely ffmpeg2dirac and li

Re: FFmpeg 0.7.2 even for F14 ?

On 04/09/11 08:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: I don't consider this a major update. It is both ABI and API compatible with what we have in F-14 and it carries security fixes which the older release doesn't have. Not to mention some very attractive features like > ... Forgetting new fe

Re: RPM's For ClipGrab

On 31/07/11 06:15, Manuel Escudero wrote: Today I found Fedora Specific RPM packages for ClipGrab, a GUI tool for Downloading Youtube Videos. The thing is, the binary file that the original developers can you add it to the rpmfusion wishlist at: http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist ?

Re: 1 bsnes-0.079-gcc46.patch, 1.1 - query

On 04/07/11 02:01, Julian Sikorski wrote: - Updated the gcc-4.6 patch Index: bsnes-0.079-gcc46.patch === RCS file: /cvs/free/rpms/bsnes/devel/bsnes-0.079-gcc46.patch,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -

Re: Support for EL-6?

On 01/07/11 23:12, Matěj Cepl wrote: > support. I was a bit surprised when rpmfusion-{free,nonfree}-release > packages have upgraded to 13.4 version, which a bit surprised me but That seems like a problem, I wonder if a bug has been submitted, is the link just to the wroong -release packages ?

Re: orphaning bsnes

On 16/06/11 06:34, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 15.06.2011 22:23, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: 2011/6/15 Julian Sikorski: I have realised that I have not been giving bsnes the love it deserves. I've pricked up my ears, but reality tells me I won't have much linux time until September in any case.

Re: Branching for F15?

On 25/05/11 08:40, Julian Sikorski wrote: W dniu 2011-05-20 00:43, Kevin Kofler pisze: shouldn't we finally branch RPM Fusion for F15 now? The Fedora release is less than a week ahead. Any updates on this? According to [1] Thorsten promised to branch the repos, but someone else needs to hand

Re: How to make nvidia-kmod source package build an akmod package

On 15/05/11 22:49, Richard Shaw wrote: I'm getting a sound card that requires a newer version of the kernel than F14 provides. (I need 2.6.38) While not answering your question, Fedora 15 is up to final release candidate RC3. The RC2 has worked fine for me all weekend. Maybe you would like to i

Re: rawhide to f15 branching

On 29/04/11 21:59, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: P.S.: /me wonders if anybody cares enough about RPM Fusion these to get the process of branching for F15 kicked off(²), there are just 3 1/2 weeks left before F15 gets released Who has actually done the task before ? For this release, would you like

Re: Self Introduction - music/audio interest.

On 30/04/11 05:55, John Brier wrote: Now I am getting into DJing and in particular using FOSS to do it. I have used Mixxx and xwax. I am becoming the co-maintainer of Mixxx in rpmfusion [2] and have just submitted my first package review request for Fedora for xwax. [3] I would like to make Fedo

Re: Maintainer needed for avidemux

On 17/04/11 04:43, Richard Shaw wrote: Since the source file needs to be the same for devel as F-14, can I just copy the "sources" file from the F-14 branch to devel? If so, do I skip the "make new-sources=..." or do something else to get cvs to update the source package? Actually there is two

Re: [Bug 1702] New: Review Request: imagination - A lightweight and simple GTK based DVD slide show creator

On 17/04/11 00:43, Richard Shaw wrote: mv %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}/html \ %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html Are the html files standalone documentation, or are they used directly by the application eg to show help ? If it's the second, then I think we wouldn't mark the

Re: Why don't Fedora provenpackagers have global write ACLs in RPM Fusion?

On 16/04/11 02:27, Kevin Kofler wrote: Why isn't provenpackager access implemented in RPM Fusion? I'm sure it's because their isn't a way for the RF fas to query the fedora fas to get the answer for RPM Fusion.

Re: akmod nvidia - failing to build - time rpm fixes it

On 13/04/11 17:24, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: Are you running a minimal environnement ? Not really, but did have some trouble during install, that was manually fixed. Can you retry with yum install time , it may have to be added to the akmod package. When I had seen the indication of time mention

akmod nvidia - failing to build

Hi, I'm having trouble with the akmod build of the nvidia module, log: = 13 Apr 08:08:43 akmods: Building RPM using the command '/usr/bin/akmodsbuild --target x86_64 --kernels 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64 /usr/src/akmods/nvidia-kmod.latest' tail: cannot open `/tmp/akmodsbuild.OFge8ysC/.jobexit'

Re: [solved] make install options in dvbcut - cant get it to use the proper rpm paths

On 04/03/11 00:17, Paul Howarth wrote: I think the Makefile already supports DESTDIR; try using: make install \ DESTDIR=%{buildroot} \ bindir=%{_bindir} \ helpdir=%{_datadir}/%{name} \ mandir=%{_mandir} OK, thanks guys. I hadn't noticed the DESTDIR capability. I was reading

help wanted - make install options in dvbcut - cant get it to use the proper rpm paths

Hi, I'm unable to get my package dvbcut to build it's RPM under F14. The compile succeeds (and the executable runs OK, but the make install stumbles when it tries to write directly to my /usr/... directory: rpmbuild -ba dvbcut.spec: ... make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/davidt/rpmbuild/B

Re: Problem with infrastructure.

On 26/01/11 05:09, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hams Nice self quip ;-)

Re: Introduction and Review Requests for PhotoFilmStrip

On 10/01/11 08:24, Mario Torre wrote: > This is my first mail to the list, and also my first package review > request ever, and so I would like to introduce myself. Welcome. > I wanted to start the process directly within the Fedora umbrella, but I > don't think this is possible since PhotoFilmStr

Re: Handbrake possible new package

On 30/12/10 11:33, gatlin sullivan wrote: > Handbrake (http://handbrake.fr/) is a utility to process and encode video > (and > audio). It is supported for the new version of Gnome. It actively develops > for > the GNU/Linux platform. A semi-nightly rpm release is made > (https://build.handbrak

build failure with no logs generated (audacity) ?

Hi, Any ideas what might have gone wrong with my build: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-14-rpmfusion_free/8513-audacity-freeworld-1.3.12-0.11.beta.fc14/

Re: NVIDIA, ATI, psb config for F14

On 30/10/10 10:25, Adam Williamson wrote: So, it seems less and less likely that this is going to be fixed by F14 GA: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623742 which means *-config-display won't work, which means enabling nvidia, fglrx and psb won't work as currently packaged. Does th

Re: We have branched for F-14

On 17/10/10 07:13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Just FYI, CVS is branched for F-14 now. Remember to update the common > checkout to make sure everything works well. ... knurd: Thanks for keeping your eye on and working on RPM Fusion, so that we are ready for the next Fedora + RPM Fusion release. I am

Re: key problem

On 15/08/10 14:58, solarflow99 wrote: > # ssh -vv solarflo...@cvs.rpmfusion.org ... > debug1: identity file /root/.ssh/id_rsa type 1 Maybe try it from normal user account ?

Re: build failure, unable to download ffmeg-(devel,libs)

On 20/07/10 01:36, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:06:32 +1000, David wrote: ... > I can only tell you that the F-12 needsign repo wasn't updated after > removing old packages from it. ffmpeg was pushed on 2010-07-13, and > any push more than two days later has removed it from the

build failure, unable to download ffmeg-(devel,libs)

I saw this with this build: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-12-rpmfusion_free/7619-audacity-freeworld-1.3.12-0.6.beta.fc12/ppc/job.log Might that be that ffmpeg is being built at the same time ? I've re-requested the build, thinking it's just a transient connection error. Is there anyth

Re: gstreamer-plugins-bad x86_64 v i686

On 18/03/10 23:03, David Timms wrote: Hi, I noticed an update for gstreamer-plugins-bad 0.10.17-4 is suggesting install of 74 additional updates, which all have an arch of i686 (on an x86_64 install AMD Phenom(tm) II X4). Is this normal / required with the new -bad-free package ? Trying here

Re: [Bug 1030] Review request: xbmc - Media center

r create new bug) This would keep the normal review stuff together, and uncluttered by the preliminary package development work. Anyone else agree/disagree ? Cheers, David Timms.

Re: Unable to create a bugzilla account - temp workaround ...

notes It might be that the packager does see your email, or someone else with appropriate available time and rights could take a look, Cheers, David Timms.

Re: rpms/realcrypt/F-10 sources, 1.3, 1.4 Drive_icon_96dpi_real.bmp.lzma, 1.1, NONE Drive_icon_mask_96dpi_real.bmp.lzma, 1.1, NONE Logo_288dpi_real.bmp.lzma, 1.1, NONE Logo_96dpi_real.bmp.lzma, 1.1,

On 12/14/2009 10:37 PM, Leigh Scott wrote: > > Log Message: > > > > > > As mentioned recently in this list, please always supply a log message with your commits, indicating the intent of your changes. The contributors wiki page lists the commands to use to do this easily, in case you have forgotten

abrt traces and semi auto submitting to bugz.rpmfusion

I thought I would see whether reporting a crash in a package I maintain (dvbcut) would actually work. It doesn't. It seems to make XML-RPC calls to Fedora's bugzilla, which fails when bugz.redhat responds with can't find the package. Is the auto bugzilla report for rpmfusion something that our pac

Re: [Bug 679] Review request: HandBrake - Multithreaded DVD to MPEG-4 converter

On 11/25/2009 04:01 PM, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679 --- Comment #16 from Bernard Johnson 2009-11-25 06:01:04 --- I know there are still a lot of people interested in HandBrake. Since 0.9.4 was just released, I thought I'd make a current build

Re: libGLcore.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

On 11/23/2009 09:30 AM, Neal Becker wrote: Got nvidia xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-190.42-2.fc12.x86_64 But I see this: (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia/libglx.so dlopen: libGLcore.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory updatedb locate libglx.so ?

Re: Should preupgrade with rpmfusion work?

On 11/16/2009 10:32 PM, Neal Becker wrote: When f12 release is official, should preupgrade work, including rpmfusion (assuming I have enough space in /boot)? I already tried it, and it failed due to rpmfusion dependencies. Did it fail in the downloading of rpmfusion rawhide packages ? or while

Re: kmod-nvidia + nuoveau in F12

On 11/04/2009 08:42 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2009/11/3 Gianluca Sforna: Is  there a different set of step to perform on F12 in order to ... I amended the wiki page. please double check I did not messed it up. I would like to suggest t

ffmpeg rawhide v dvbcut v selinux

Hi, A fresh rebuild and update 2 latest svn release for dvbcut now triggers selinux denials, and won't start. I think it was in swscale, a text relocation issue. Is that something that is now a feature of ffmpeg ? Do we need to request policy adjust (eg things moved etc) ? I can give more de

Re: prep error - howto

On 10/15/2009 10:29 PM, David Timms wrote: On 10/15/2009 07:14 AM, solarflow99 wrote: how to do it with the src rpm for a new branch when F-12 comes out? From memory, at/soon after release, a process is run that creates the F-12 branches for every package, and copies the current devel

Re: prep error - howto

On 10/15/2009 07:14 AM, solarflow99 wrote: ke new-sources FILES="foo-0.0.2.tar.bz2 foo.desktop foo-source, etc." update the release in the spec file cvs diff -u make clog cvs commit -F clog rm clog make tag build I think the "for packagers" page says pretty well that:

Re: cvs question

On 08/25/2009 05:58 AM, solarflow99 wrote: thanks guys, I didn't realize committing clog was important to read in the other changes too. it isn't technically. clog = commit log. You use it to describe the changes that you are committing. It makes it so people can track changes to software, with

trouble with bugzilla.rpmfusion - can you check it out

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118 Waited an hour before trying again, and got this page: = Bugzilla has suffered an internal error. Please save this page and send it to matth...@rpmforge.net with details of what you were doing at the time this message appeared. URL: htt

website trouble - OK again now.

Hi, I was having some trouble with the rpm web sites (wiki and bugzilla): [ 2009-06-23 ~08:10 (AEST) =23:10 UTC ] (08:24, OK) I had a page (install repo package) left open in firefox (on f11), overnight. I clicked the fusion logo (top left): shows 1.png The details thing has the attached html Tr

Re: Sponsors in RPM Fusion

reviewing, and helping to get packages over the line, in both Fedora and RPM Fusion, so I would also like to see Orcan become a sponsor, +1 from David Timms DaveT.

Re: Some stat on rpmfusion usage

On 18/05/09 02:09, David Timms wrote: On 17/05/09 02:46, Remi Collet wrote: Of course, this is only computed from the activity of 1 mirror but it can give you a idea (comparison between packages) Quick tidbits: - arch: i386 is 3x more popular than x86_64. - release: F9 and F10 are currently

Re: Some stat on rpmfusion usage

On 17/05/09 02:46, Remi Collet wrote: Of course, this is only computed from the activity of 1 mirror but it can give you a idea (comparison between packages) Quick tidbits: - arch: i386 is 3x more popular than x86_64. - release: F9 and F10 are currently even on usage, with F8 still over half of

Re: RFC regarding rpmfusion-{non,}free-release and F11

On 17/05/09 04:45, Till Maas wrote: How about using a %post scriptlet that changes only this URL in *.repo files if they exist? This is not a very intrusive change and would be imho ok. Is there a list about which old URLs should be mapped to which new ones? Any way to allow it to work like: if

mplayer - libungif.so.4.1.6.debug: The separate debug info file has no debug info

Hi, I have a bug posted at bz.redhat.com [1] , where it has now been suggested that this could be resolved by building mplayer against libgif, rather than libungif. I don't know anything about whether that is a valid analysis, so I thought I would mention it here, before creating an bz.rpmfusio

Re: Oranization of the sponsorship system on rpmfusion.org

Jochen Schmitt wrote: On Sun, 3 May 2009 21:53:00 +0200, you wrote: The only allowed sponsors in RPM Fusion are Fedora sponsors." This is the key bit. As secondt, How you will become a sponsor on rpmfusion.org which can sponsor a new contributor on rpmfusion.org. That was my original questio

BRing qt3 on both fedora and EPEL

Hi, I got a few hints reqarding this on IRC: I'm trying to adjust my spec to BR qt 3, in a way that works on EPEL and Fedora. mharris suggested this might work: BuildRequires: qt-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: qt-devel < 4, which -bs ok, actual build fails: error: Failed build dependencies:

Re: make build - nothing happens

Neal Becker wrote: My first rpmfusion package. CVSROOT=:ext:nbec...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/free cvs co blcr Did you do [export CVS_RSH=ssh] ? cvs checkout: Updating blcr ... [nbec...@nbecker1 ~]$ cd blcr [nbec...@nbecker1 blcr]$ cd devel [nbec...@nbecker1 devel]$ ls [nbec...@nbecker1 devel]$

Re: Where we are and where do we what to go - encouraging third party repos.

Andrea Musuruane wrote: invite 3rd party maintainers again and ask them to join. If they don't want to join, we should politely ask why. We should stress about our strengths and the benefits of joining (only one repo, very visible, peer review to improve quality, build system, cvs, etc). - Are

Re: Where we are and where do we what to go?

Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:53:46 +0100, Thorsten wrote: - still lots of other 3rd party repos out there; users still run into problems as they try to mix incompatible repos; should we actively try to get more repos merged into RPM Fusion? Yes! I haven't been on lists etc

Re: Where we are and where do we what to go?

with etc). {i'm thinking hal and PK integration) Maybe that would cut down on 10-20 % of that lists traffic ! = kmods in the repo = Do we want to store the complete set of built kmods forever ? These are sort of multiplicative - if they aren't already, it won't be long before released kmod variants exceed actual packages in number. Could we assume that all older kmod releases are redundant since they can be built on the user's system with akmod ? And hence remove them from the repo ? Maybe just keep the latest 2, plus the one from Fedora release time ? Cheers (hope I didn't bore you with this), David Timms.

Re: Fate of our tracker bugs

Orcan Ogetbil wrote: So... Is there any objection from anyone to the idea of keeping all our closed review requests to block RF_ACCEPT? Can anyone think of a case where this will cause trouble in the future? I would prefer them to stay easily searchable as a "have been reviewed" by checking RF

Re: Error using smplayer

Mario Chacon wrote: mplayer /home/masch/Download/Algo\ Habran\ Hecho\ -\ 3\ temp\ \(Armado\)\ final/VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_3.VOB mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libaa.so.1: invalid ELF header Does rpm verify find an issue with any of ? rpm -V mplayer rpm -V smplayer rpm -V aalib

  1   2   >