On 07/07/2009 08:19 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
Subject basically says it already: I from now on plan to mostly leave
all the hard, sometimes painful and often unnoticed and underestimated
work in the infrastructure area (e.g. setting up and maintaining build
master, build slaves, CVS and o
a...@kanarip.com which is what I'm registered with in different
Bugzilla's).
Thanks,
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
On 03/24/2009 10:10 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 03/23/2009 04:00 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Hi there,
Just a quick question before I start doing the work involved;
would RPMFusion ship openmotif? More details on why it's not in Fedora
(anymore) are on https://fedoraproject.org
Hi there,
Just a quick question before I start doing the work involved;
would RPMFusion ship openmotif? More details on why it's not in Fedora
(anymore) are on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RexDieter/openmotif
-Jeroen
rebranded.
There is no connection with the specific version of fedora-release,
because both generic-release and fedora-release have the same version
number.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
oot option.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
Andreas Thienemann wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
You're right, I'm unable to think of a way that would currently work. It
could be done, but it'd reintroduce the "Do you want to use any
additional media (...)" dialog in anaconda and would
Andreas Thienemann wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Just curious, how would the genuine Fedora DVD or CD set know about the
extra media during the installation? Of course additional media is
useful *after* the initial installation where people can point a repo to
the
initial installation where people can point a repo to
the media:// url, possibly that .repo file could even be included in the
rpmfusion-release package.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
ating / respinning spins.
FWIW^2, Red Hat Emerging Technologies' Genome project as well as the
Fedora Unity project use a simple configuration file which is
distributed in a package to users as well, for use with Revisor.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
name
Fedora from such spin. (meaning removing artworks and some others
packages i don't remember)
As Jeroen van Meeuwen, this is not a big deal technically as you make it out
True. It is easier than I thought..
At least we can first works at the documentation step providing a .ks
and a "
olicy at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pfrields/NewTrademarkGuidelines
I hope this clarifies some of the issues wrt. a RPMFusion spin.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
t; category instead
of having additional groups inside the existing categories.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
roup.
How about a separate category for RPM Fusion packages? You would need to
try to not use the same group.name, and not the same group.groupid.
Sounds reasonable and doable, don't you think?
Again, just an idea / my $0.02
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 24.11.2007 09:44, Hans de Goede wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
And this is really a bug in ... yum, right?
Is it?
Not sure.
If you look in Pirut you will see that there is a higher level of
sorting above groups, and in this level of sorting we put the livna
And this is really a bug in ... yum, right?
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for being non verbose, but I hope this explains it the best:
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ yum groupinfo "Games and Entertainment"
Setting up Group Process
Group: Games and Entertainment
Description: Various ways to
16 matches
Mail list logo
