Hi
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
mplayer was built against ffmpeg 2.4, but you do not have ffmpeg 2.4
installed.
Well, ffmpeg 2.4 is not available in the repository yet for some reason
Rahul
On 05/16/2010 06:39 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Sunday, 16 May 2010 at 14:48, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
It appears mplayer cannot handle play FLV files correctly in Fedora 13.
I get no video at all. Totem works fine. Is this a known issue? Also
gnome-mplayer always
Hi
SSIA
Rahul
On 05/17/2010 06:03 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Do I understand this correctly?
* FESCO has a approved an installer which circumvents rpm?
* This installer is installing to /usr/share?
That seems to be a misunderstanding. Autodownloader downloads data to
your home directory. Not /usr/share.
On 05/17/2010 06:13 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/17/2010 02:39 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/17/2010 06:03 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Do I understand this correctly?
* FESCO has a approved an installer which circumvents rpm?
* This installer is installing to /usr/share
On 05/17/2010 06:24 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
downloads and verifies them.
Can you explain how? Autodownloader has a hash of the files that it
$HOME == automated arbitrary access to arbitrary user data == arbirary
option to install maliculous programs (viruses, spyware etc.).
It is not
On 05/17/2010 06:33 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Did you even try out autodownloader
and understand how it works? Doesn't seem like it at all.
No, I haven't, and I certainly will not try it.
.
I don't disagree that RPM packaged data is better but claiming that it
is a attack vector for trojans
On 05/16/2010 06:10 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Sunday, 16 May 2010 at 02:02, Kevin Kofler wrote:
[...]
IMHO the whole affected games should move to RPM Fusion Nonfree and
autodownloader should be removed from Fedora.
I really don't see why we're bypassing Fedora's
Hi,
It appears mplayer cannot handle play FLV files correctly in Fedora 13.
I get no video at all. Totem works fine. Is this a known issue? Also
gnome-mplayer always throws out the error Failed to open VDPAU backend
libvdpau_nvidia.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
On 05/16/2010 06:08 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday, 15 May 2010 at 00:32, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
In RPMFusion, we have two repos - free and non-free and from a end user
perspective, they are very very likely to want both these repositories.
Instead
On 05/16/2010 06:39 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Sunday, 16 May 2010 at 14:48, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi,
It appears mplayer cannot handle play FLV files correctly in Fedora 13.
I get no video at all. Totem works fine. Is this a known issue? Also
gnome-mplayer always
On 05/16/2010 06:40 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/5/16 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
mailto:kevin.kof...@chello.at
IMHO the whole affected games should move to RPM Fusion Nonfree and
autodownloader should be removed from Fedora.
I really don't see why we're bypassing Fedora's
On 05/16/2010 06:45 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I tend to thinks that the wrong direction in the long term, as that
still doesn't solve problems like where do I get the flash-plugin for
new users.
I don't see that. If you agree that a single release package to install
makes RPM Fusion
On 05/16/2010 06:44 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
While I agree the the sentiment, the problem is that the maintainers of
these games would have to agree to drop them in Fedora and then either
package them themselves in RPM Fusion or allow others to package them.
I'm not sure we'll get the
Hi,
In RPMFusion, we have two repos - free and non-free and from a end user
perspective, they are very very likely to want both these repositories.
Instead of having to install two separate release packages to get what
they want, can we generate a sub package, say rpmfusion-release-all that
On 01/12/2010 02:06 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
Ok, do I need a new review or just add a new CVS request in the
former review ticket?
I believe just a cvs request would do but I am not very familiar on the
current practises here.
Rahul
On 12/20/2009 04:19 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Gianluca Sforna wrote:
b. split the libogmrip-aac.so plugin to a subpackage, put this in non-free
This makes more sense, but due to how RPM Fusion is
On 11/26/2009 06:37 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
I have an issue with the nvidia driver in KDE. Certain actions, such as
- clicking on the K-menu
- clicking on the clock
- using an auto hiding panel
- ...
freezes KDE for 10 exact seconds. Afterwards things continue as if
nothing happened. I
On 09/23/2009 10:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
My review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 has been
waiting on CVS for quite a long time now - is this normal? it's usually
pretty fast for Fedora packages...
It appears there is a need for more people working on RPM Fusion
Hi
These folks have a bunch of extra kmods essentially. Might want to
invite them to join fusion
http://elrepo.org/tiki/About
Rahul
Hi
# yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdeinterlace.so from install of
gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-1.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from
package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11.i586
file
Hi,
Any plans to support this in RPM Fusion? Afaik, you just need to do,
createrepo with --deltas argument on the server side. Bodhi does this
for updates in Fedora but you can just do it with a cron job here.
Rahul
Hi,
EL repo (mplayer?) seems to have a PulseAudio library dependency. That
doesn't make much sense as EL 5 doesn't include PulseAudio at all.
Rahul
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Hi there,
Just a quick question before I start doing the work involved;
would RPMFusion ship openmotif? More details on why it's not in Fedora
(anymore) are on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RexDieter/openmotif
It is still distributable and should be just fine for
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Sure it sounds unrealistic(¹); but that afaics doesn't matter at all
afaics (see below).
(¹) and I don't think it's that unrealistic; just for a moment think
what could happen if evil company buys Red Hat tomorrow
They don't control the dozens and dozens of
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
We nevertheless IMHO once again should ask in public (blog and
spins-list maybe?) if somebody want to do a KDE spin with RPM Fusion
before we do one with Gnome -- then we can point users that complain
why don't you hvae a KDE spin there and tell them nobody
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
What do you mean?
ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/spins/README.Omega-10-Release-Notes
doesn#t contain the word KDE afaics. Or do you mean the Do you plan
on do other variants? part?
Latter. It clearly informs everyone that they are free to do additional
variants and are
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Maybe putting everything aside and starting fresh might help; e.g.
discuss what we want: name(s), target audience, gnome vs. kde (we
should do both), free and nonfree, Live-Spin vs. regular install
media, ...; that might help to get things rolling again (but maybe
Kevin Kofler wrote:
gnome vs. kde (we should do both)
+1
The current Omega isn't of much use to KDE users.
Then build a KDE variant. What is stopping you?
Rahul
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
But right now there isn't much to decide afaik, as omega includes
packages that are not part of Fedora and RPM Fusion. That IMHO makes
it just as unacceptable for RPM Fusion as an official Fedora spin with
a RPM Fusion package in it.
I will just add this: In my
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
- ideally a KDE spin as well, as I would like to prevent RPM Fusion
ignores KDE fame; related: the name discussion, as the basic name of
our first spin should leave room for other spins, hence your spins
would need to be something like Omega Desktop or Omega Gnome
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
[Catching up on this after a long time so excuse the delay]
- no RPM Fusion Fedora remix maintained within the project; do we
want one? Or even proper install DVDs that already contain packages
from RPM Fusion?
I was very happy to see Rahul do some work here, way to
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
From: Tom spot Callaway tcallawa...
Well, the issue is that the game is clearly disparaging Microsoft and
its marks. I'm not sure any amount of artwork replacement will
overcome that.
WTF, since when is parody illegal? It's even an exception
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Conrad Meyer wrote:
apt-rpm doesn't work in current Fedora anyways.
To be more precise, command-line apt-rpm is completely broken in F10 and
higher, Synaptic already in F9.
So if somebody cares strongly about apt, they'll have to fix apt first!
Kevin
Rohan Dhruva wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded the omega-10-desktop.iso which is the Omega 10 final
release. The SHA1SUM matches.
I tried to use the livecd-iso-to-disk utility to make a LiveUSB out
of the ISO. However, I tried it twice, and both time it fails. The
first time I tried, on booting from the
Hi,
Omega is a Linux based operating system and a Fedora remix suitable for
desktop and laptop users. It is a installable Live CD for regular PC
(i686 architecture) systems. It has all the features of Fedora 10 and
number
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 04.12.2008 14:49, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Omega is a Linux based operating system and a Fedora remix suitable
for desktop and laptop users. It is a installable Live CD for regular
PC (i686 architecture) systems. It has all the features of Fedora 10
and a number
Rex Dieter wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
This was essentially the same issue with rpmfusion release packages as
well. Please rebuild this package and depend on system-release instead
of fedora-release, so that Fedora remixes can use livna-release
correctly. Thanks.
I was about to go
Farkas Levente wrote:
any change to skype work out of box without this workaround in the near
future?
You can report the problem to Skype and ask them to fix it.
Rahul
Dejan Lekic wrote:
Hello Peter,
frankly I did not think they would go into the main repository, at
least not yet. If Fedora guys later on decide to put it there, I would
not mind, naturally. :) I like the RPMFusion idea as I used all those
repositories earlier, and I want to be part of it.
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
And I think it makes the most sense, as the Z-Streams/the Extended
Update Support (EUS) (e.g. update support for 5.1 after 5.2 is out)
are only done for certain releases, only for a shorter lifespan and
only if you pay extra for them iirc. Hence the bulk of users
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Hi,
I've just stumbled upon CentOS Moin Moin theme. I like very much
and I think that is more attractive than the one we currently have.
http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/WikiDesign
I wonder what you think about. If you like it too, I'd like to try to
adapt it to RPM
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
I don't know what has changed (and whose fault it might be), but today's
rpmfusion/rawhide update broke totem video play back badly for me
on an F10/rawhide + rpmfusion-free + rpmfusion-nonfree system.
E.g. I am observing
* selinux alerts related
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
2008/11/1 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
P.S.: Who will actually send out the announcement and where do we send it
besides fedora-announce-list and fedora{-devel,}-list?
I'd say the more the better
Hi,
While running Fedora with rpmfusion packages enabled, I have been
running into a series of SELinux policy issues which all result from
changes in policy in rawhide and basically fall into the same category.
It would be useful if rpmfusion packagers run with SELinux enabled or
atleast
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
And exactly that I in went ahead with a name I picked IMHO is
totally unacceptable in a *community* project
I can't force people to give me feedback. I did ask for suggestions
before picking one. I did post the kickstart file as well for people to
give input on the
KH KH wrote:
What I don't like much with Omega, hosted here is that:RPMFusion is
defined as an additional repository for Fedora.This means RPMFusion is
not another distribution based on Fedora.
As a RPMFusion contributor. I still want to think I'm contributing to
Fedora via an additional
KH KH wrote:
There is one well known problem with vlc and selinux
It only appears with F10 x86 and consist in a selinux denial for one
mmx version of its plugin.
(one libmpeg2 selinux problem has been (re)-fixed recently).
I found a recent similar issue with mplayer. It is being discussed at
Hi,
The latest rawhide snapshot + rpmfusion repos. This includes
generic-logos and generic-release (since rpmfusion release packages now
depends on system-release), fixes a number of issues:
* Default user is simply liveuser instead of fedora
* No more About Fedora menu item
* SELinux is
Hi,
I would like to start hosting omega as part of rpmfusion
infrastructure. A subdomain like omega.rpmfusion.org would be a good
space. Thoughts? Anyone testing the rawhide snapshots?
Rahul
Xavier Lamien wrote:
I really appreciate the effort and the work done for this spin but
I'd really see a _clear_ discussion about that project before start
host anything (including the name of the future Official RPMFusion
spin).
We have already been discussing the details including the name
Hi,
If I stuck this portion into the fedora-live initscript, it would enable
sudo for the first user entered during firstboot. Does this seem like a
sensible thing to do? Does anyone have the details handy on modifying
consolehelper as well?
-
# check for the first user and
Neal Becker wrote:
I prefer not putting user in wheel, but just putting:
nbecker ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
This is a possibility as well but If I have to make a choice, I would
want to know not just what you prefer but also why.
Rahul
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 01.10.2008 16:43, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
If I stuck this portion into the fedora-live initscript, it would
enable sudo for the first user entered during firstboot. Does this
seem like a sensible thing to do? Does anyone have the details handy
on modifying
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 01.10.2008 16:43, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
If I stuck this portion into the fedora-live initscript, it would
enable sudo for the first user entered during firstboot. Does this
seem like a sensible thing to do? Does
Hi,
I have done a new compose of the live cd with rpmfusion development
repositories - both free and non-free enabled. Only a select few
packages from the free repo is installed by default however. No
additional configuration changes. Do test it and let me know what you
think. The only
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hence my questions maybe might have been answered already, but
- where does the name omeaga come from?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega
The word literally means great O
Omega (the last letter of the Greek alphabet) is often used to denote
the last, the end, or the
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Add-on: We have no fully configured bug tracker yet for RPM Fusion. As
such: please do *not* further distribute or link to above mail in
Blogs, Forums or other Mailing lists for now. We'll announce a
official testing phase for RPM Fusion once we have the important
مؤيد السعدي wrote:
BTW: is it [omega] based on F10 or F9
Fedora 10. As the announcement says, it is roughly similar to Fedora 10
Beta.
BTW: some people suggested lzma which will give us about 60MB
RPM now accepts LZMA payloads as well as sources. Squashfs + LZMA
patches would save
We proudly present to you, dear users with Omega. Omega is a Linux based
operating system suitable for desktop and laptop users. It is a Live CD
for regular PC (i686 architecture) systems that includes a variety of
free and open source software from Fedora and Livna repository. You can
try
Xavier Bachelot wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (EL - free) testing/5: 4
...
NEW xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.15-2.el5 : Non-free extra codecs for the Xine
Rex Dieter wrote:
Excellent points. I'll change that asap. Suggestions for new
language for summary/description welcome.
Summary: Extra codecs for Xine multimedia library
Description: Extra codecs for Xine multimedia library. These are free
and open source but left out of the official
Andreas Thienemann wrote:
I'm a bit concerned that this will result in a lot of technically
illiterate users installung our fedora because it just works!!!111!!
and then come crying back to usthat it doesn't look like fedora, that we
broke something or whatever else they can come up with.
In
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Define works.
Works for me and I am using it on a regular basis for the usual tasks. I
have bugs filed for some instances where it does not.
So far, I am having a lot of problems with PackageKit as well as
NetworkManager, ...
Make sure you have the latest updates
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 10:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Define works.
Works for me and I am using it on a regular basis for the usual tasks.
Single user desktop, I suppose?
Yes and otherwise as well.
Make sure you have
KH KH wrote:
True. It is easier than I thought..
At least we can first works at the documentation step providing a .ks
and a replacement package for the fedora-logos (outside of the
RPMFusion repository?)
You can only build a rpmfusion-logos package after you have enough
artwork to do the
Felix Kaechele wrote:
If necessary I could try and help out with some artwork
That would be great. Take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/ThemingOverview
If you have questions, post in fedora-art list or login to #fedora-art
in freenode.
Rahul
to a local mirror if available.
Set SELinux to permissive mode and run the following command.
# mkdir /var/tmp/cache
# livecd-creator --config=livecd-fedora-9-desktop-rpmfusion.ks
--fslabel=rpmfusion-spin --cache=/var/tmp/cache/
Rahul
# rpmfusion spin - Maintained by Rahul Sundaram [EMAIL
Stewart Adam wrote:
That sounds fine - I think maybe a DVD spin with all the rpmfusion
packages would be useful as well for offline installs.
My experience (with xfce, games and other locale specific spins) is
limited to the Live media spins. I haven't looked into Pungi much. If
anyone
KH KH wrote:
I don't know if Thorsten ever mention such spin but having both
rpmfusion and fedora on the same media is a very hard legal issue.
Actually that's even not possible at all without removing the name
Fedora from such spin. (meaning removing artworks and some others
packages i don't
70 matches
Mail list logo
