Hello,
I'd like to orphan the "motion" motion detection package because I'm not using
it anymore and I can't give it much love. It is a low maintenance package with
2 small improvement requests open:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/buglist.cgi?product=Fedora&component=motion&resolution=---
So s
Thanks, I contacted upstream to integrate the modification.
On Sep 4, 2011, at 12:06 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Attached.
>
> --
> Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
> RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
> "Faith manages."
>-- Del
Hi Thorsten,
IMO, the best option would be to involve people from the Fedora
Infrastructure. Some of them probably read this list, but did you have
any formal contact with them?
I'm going to FUDCon Zürich next month, I can bring the issue up as
everyone is using RPMFusion anyway...
Steven
On 08/11/2009 10:27 PM, Adrian Reber wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:52:22PM +0200, Steven Moix wrote:
I'm having some trouble with the update of a package (motion). The build
process for the devel and F10 branches went fine, but the F11 branch
fails miserably due to a wrong source. Yo
Hello all,
I'm having some trouble with the update of a package (motion). The build
process for the devel and F10 branches went fine, but the F11 branch
fails miserably due to a wrong source. You can see the error here:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?email=steven.m...@axian
Hi,
On 05/20/2009 07:31 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
What is the cost of updating ffmpeg on F-10? If it is not feasible,
can we at least get this infamous bug fixed?
As far as I can tell, we'll run in the same "mass rebuild" problem we
had some months ago in rawhide. A lot of applications need
r
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 08:01 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> motion-3_2_11-4_fc11 on
>
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/3261-motion-3.2.11-4.fc11/ppc
That's a bug which should be corrected in motion's next version, coming
out in a couple of days. Until then,
Hi,
I just made an (in)formal review of
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406 corresponding to all
the points in the Fedora guidelines. I'm currently sponsored as a Fedora
contributor but don't have any package in rpmfusion yet (bug 414 is
waiting for a formal review).
So, am I allow
Hello rpmfusion folks,
I just submitted my first review request for "motion":
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414
The review should be quite simple, I'm just not sure about the %files
section regarding directory ownership. The base SPEC file was an old one
someone made in 2005 and
