On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:45:57PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Good question, all branches are open for work, but el7 first needs to
> be bootstrapped (any volunteer for that ?)
What needs to be bootstrapped? Can't CentOS and EPEL 7 just be used as
as a package source like Fedora is used for
Hi,
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:48:53AM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> http://pkgs.rpmfusion.org (even with let's encrypt certificate).
this is awesome.
> Also to mention is that the new infra is ansible managed (old services
> are still using puppet), the public part is located here:
> https:/
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:30:42AM +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> One concern is that some of the rpms that third parties provide do ship
> their own repo files. So, after the user installs a package, he might
> end up with two repo files? We'll have to use proper conflicts in the
> specs. What about
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 01:02:39PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Since no one has stepped up yet I have a proposal but I don't know how
> easy it will be to accomplish.
I asked at the local university whether they could provide a builder.
They are currently looking for a possible machine, therefore
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:17:21PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> fact that the one and only active rpm fusion build system sits on that pipe.
> I'd
> like to see another system (or systems) elsewhere brought up sooner than
> later, so builds can be migrated to them, at which point, I can reti
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:15:07PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
> wrote:
> > fdc have cheap machines, arround $39 / month
> >
> > fdcservers.net
>
> The only plan I saw for $39/mo was for a dual core Atom... not a good
> choice for a build serv
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:01:48PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> In other words, I won't do the following things anymore if there isn't a
> strong reason for me to do them
> - CVS requests
> - buildsys issues
Afaics, these are the only two tasks that one needs training for. I
could help out
Hiyas,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:42:26PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> I just wondered how the RPM packages from Fedora used in RPMFusion
> buildroots are verfied on the RPMFusion builders. Fedora uses direct
> access to the RPM packages via a secure channel afaik, but since
> RPMFus
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 08:19:21AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> mock typically does not verify keys (making the assumption that the
> repos used internally are generally trusted implicitly).
Afaik, the default configuration of mock is to use it only on machines
very trustworthy people have access (
Hiyas,
I just wondered how the RPM packages from Fedora used in RPMFusion
buildroots are verfied on the RPMFusion builders. Fedora uses direct
access to the RPM packages via a secure channel afaik, but since
RPMFusion does not use Fedora infrastructure, this seems not to be
possible. Also I did no
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:51:15PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > If this is a problem, then it cannot go into any RPMFusion repository,
> > because packages in RPMFusion still need to be legally distributable,
> > even if they are in the nonfree rep
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 07:18:26PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Am 03.11.2009 19:07, schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
> > As far as I know, GPL has an exception for linking against system
> > components (i.e. kernel). So free repo should be fine.
> >
> > Please correct me if I'm wrong.
> Yes, but I'm talki
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:12:40AM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Therefore, to achieve the wanted result you should do something like this:
>
> %if 0%{?fedora} >= 12
> ExclusiveArch: i686
> %endif
> %if 0%{?fedora} >= 11
> ExclusiveArch: i586
> %else
> ExclusiveArch: i386
> %endif
This will a
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:44:12PM +0800, solarflow99 wrote:
> well, I downloaded the plague-client, and created the 3 certs, I see a
> variable has to be set to tell it to use them. then im at a loss as what to
> do next, where are we supposed to type make build? if only I had an example
> of a
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 03:11:54AM +0800, solarflow99 wrote:
> I've made some additions, now I got as far as plague-client and got stuck
> again. http://rpmfusion.org/Buildsystem/PlagueUsage
> I'll be happy to include some examples in the wiki if someone can show me
> how its done, please?
What
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:21:44PM +0800, solarflow99 wrote:
> hi, I just wondered who I can send corrections about the website to?
There is a Infrastructure Product in Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Infrastructure
Regards
Till
pgpsfbh9Bi3y7.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:20:10PM +0800, solarflow99 wrote:
> BTW, I can think of some changes and additions to make to
> http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors avoid someone else having these problems,
Luckily it is a wiki, so you can easily edit the page:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors?action=ed
On Do Mai 14 2009, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hmmm, not completely sure yet, but that might work. Care to send a
> patch? Ideally one that
> * makes sure we don't need to do similar things for F12 and later
This is my suggestion:
http://till.fedorapeople.org/rpmfusion/
> * also makes the user aw
On Do Mai 14 2009, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Our repo files OTOH contain vital options that are needed to make things
> work. And people that do such major changes to the repo files really
> should expect that they need to revisit those when doing a update to a
> new major release.
People who do
On Di Mai 12 2009, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> - mark the repo files for the initial rpmfusion-{non,}free-release-11
> package as %config instead of %config(noreplace). That way we make sure
> the new repo files get into the right place and actually used by yum; if
> the old repo files had been mod
On Thu December 18 2008, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Can you rewrite your patch according with the fact that rpmfusion mock
> cfg files will be :
> fedora-10-i386-rpmfusion_nonfree.cfg and fedora-10-i386-rpmfusion_free.cfg
> ?etc
Why do you want to use a different naming scheme than all the other mo
On Saturday 13 December 2008 11:25:06 Xavier Lamien wrote:
> Kmods are really easy specifically for virtualbox ;)
> I'll push all eta of packages set the next week if people
> don't mind.
Btw. there is already a review request for kBuild, which you can probably take
over:
https://bugzilla.redhat
On Wed November 12 2008, Chris Nolan wrote:
> Following this discussion [1] I have put together a Wordpress blog for
> rpmfusion.org [2].
>
> You can log in with your FAS username and password: it uses a simple
> plugin to securely authenticate users against FAS and maps users to a
> Wordpress "rol
On Sun November 9 2008, Chris Nolan wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > With using the FAS credentials, that allow to produce major damage in the
> > wrong hands, within an application that is considered not very secure
> > make my security concerns grow a lot more. I know that they
On Sun November 9 2008, Chris Nolan wrote:
> I'd also be happy to help host/setup a blog for rpmfusion. I have good
> experience with wordpress - PHP is more my realm than packaging!
>
> If FAS allows some kind of API for login/group verification then I'm
> fairly confident I can hack together a w
On Sun November 2 2008, Chris Nolan wrote:
> I'm not too sure why I would trust a CAcert signed certificate over a
> self-signed?
With the CAcert signed certificate, you can at least verify it somehow,
because the CAcert root certificate / fingerprints can be obtained by several
ways. A self-si
On Wed October 8 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I would like to start hosting omega as part of rpmfusion
> infrastructure. A subdomain like omega.rpmfusion.org would be a good
> space. Thoughts? Anyone testing the rawhide snapshots?
I suggest to use spins.rpmfusion.org or rpmfusion.org/spins.
T
On Sun October 12 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> And exactly that "I" in "went ahead with a name I picked" IMHO is
> totally unacceptable in a *community* project when it comes to important
> issues (like releasing and branding a new spin; just imagine what had
> happened if "I" (me in this cont
On Sat October 11 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 09.10.2008 07:07, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > We have already been discussing the details including the name for a
> > while in this list.
>
> Please point me to that discussion. As far as I remember and from
> searching "omega site:lists.rpmfusi
On Wed October 1 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> usermod -G wheel $USER
Maybe you want to add "-a" to add the group wheel, instead of replacing all
other groups.
Regards,
Till
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tue August 5 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 30.07.2008 18:09, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> > -desktop-file-install --vendor="livna" \
> > +desktop-file-install --vendor="rpmfusion" \
>
> Do we want to do that (here and everywhere)? Quoting from
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelin
On Monday 10 March 2008 11:22:01 Xavier Lamien wrote:
> I need some outside feedbacks on FAS registrations.
> Here are some steps to reproduce
>
> 1. Create an account here : http://fas.rpmfusion.org/accounts/userbox.cgi
> http://fas.rpmfusion.org/accounts/gen-cert.cgi
> http://fas.rpmfusion.org
On Fri March 7 2008, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> And what is preferred: dkms or kmod?
Afaik kmod, somehow then akmod is supported which is something like dkms (I do
not know more about akmod than this).
Regards,
Till
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thu January 31 2008, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 17:48 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> I seem to recall that you can yum install kmodtool from livna. Yep,
> there it is...
>
> http://livna-dl.reloumirrors.net/fedora/development/SRPMS/kmodtool-1-7.lvn9
>.src.
On Thu January 31 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 31.01.2008 16:16, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Thu January 31 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> On 31.01.2008 14:15, Till Maas wrote:
> >>> And in which repository should it be?
> >>
> >> free.
On Thu January 31 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 31.01.2008 14:15, Till Maas wrote:
> > And in which repository should it be?
>
> free.rpmfusion.org likely, as it's used to build free modules as well
Is there a repo available already? There is no webserver on port 80 ava
Aloa,
is there an upstream place for kmodtool? And in which repository should it be?
And why is it not in Fedora (I cannot find it in Fedora and also there seems
to be no review request).
Regards,
Till
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
37 matches
Mail list logo
